How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. 17T Pro vs Poco F9 Ultra

Xiaomi 17T Pro vs Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra

What 17T Pro does better (7) and where Poco F9 Ultra wins (11) — every spec side by side.

Xiaomi 17T Pro
Xiaomi · 202617T Pro
9.7Score
7 advantages≈ $590
vs
Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra
Xiaomi · 2026Poco F9 Ultra
9.7Score
11 advantages≈ $890
9.7Display9.7
9.4Performance9.6
9.8Camera9.8
9.8Battery9.8
9.7Features9.5
Dimensions

Size comparison

17T ProPoco F9 Ultra
77.5 × 162.28.377.9 × 163.58.7
17T ProPoco F9 UltraDifference
Height162.2 mm163.5 mm−1.3 mm
Width77.5 mm77.9 mm−0.4 mm
Thickness8.3 mm8.7 mm−0.4 mm
Weight219 g235 g−16 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is 17T Pro better than Poco F9 Ultra?

  1. 4K video frame rate120 fps vs 60 fps2×
  2. Drop resistance classB vs C
  3. Pixel density447 ppi vs 416 ppi+7%
  4. Weight219 g vs 235 g+7%
  5. Charged in 30 min72% vs 60%+20%
  6. Resolution (width)1,280 px vs 1,200 px+7%
  7. Thickness8.3 mm vs 8.7 mm+5%

Why is Poco F9 Ultra better than 17T Pro?

  1. Main camera50 MP vs 200 MP4×
  2. AnTuTu score2,795,030 vs 4,165,108+49%
  3. Battery capacity7,000 mAh vs 8,050 mAh+15%
  4. Refresh rate144 Hz vs 185 Hz+28%
  5. Active use (test)21.7 h vs 24.6 h+13%
  6. Geekbench 6 (multi-core)9,766 vs 10,500+8%
  7. Peak brightness3,500 nits vs 4,500 nits+29%
  8. Measured brightness1,069 nits vs 1,283 nits+20%
  9. CPU frequency4.21 GHz vs 4.6 GHz+9%
  10. USB version2 vs 3.2+60%
  11. Endurance per cycle71 h vs 81 h+14%
Specifications

Side by side

Xiaomi 17T ProXiaomi 17T Pro≈ $5909.7
Design
Weight219 g235 g
Thickness8.3 mm8.7 mm
Height162.2 mm163.5 mm
Width77.5 mm77.9 mm
FrameAluminiumAluminium
BackGlassPlastic
Ingress protectionIP68IP68
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8IPx8
Glass protectionCorning Gorilla Glass 7iCorning Gorilla Glass 7i
ColoursDeep Blue, Deep Violet, BlackBlack, Dark Cherry
Display
Screen size6.8″6.9″
PanelAMOLEDAMOLED
OLED panelYesYes
Resolution (width)1,280 px1,200 px
Resolution (height)2,772 px2,608 px
Pixel density447 ppi416 ppi
Refresh rate144 Hz185 Hz
Peak brightness3,500 nits4,500 nits
Measured brightness1,069 nits1,283 nits
Screen-to-body ratio91.1%91.6%
HDRYesYes
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 9500Qualcomm SM8850-AC Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
Chip makerMediaTekQualcomm
Process3 nm3 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency4.21 GHz4.6 GHz
GPUMali-G1 Ultra MC12Adreno 840
AnTuTu score2,795,0304,165,108
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)9,76610,500
3DMark Wild Life Extreme6,939—
Memory
RAM16 GB16 GB
Storage (max)1,024 GB1,024 GB
Storage (base)256 GB256 GB
Storage typeUFS 4.1UFS 4.1
Memory card slotNoNo
Camera
Main camera50 MP200 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.7f/1.7
Main sensor size1/1.31"1/1.56"
Rear cameras33
Optical stabilisationYesYes
Ultra-wide cameraYesYes
Telephoto cameraYesYes
Optical zoom5×5×
Max video8K8K
4K video frame rate120 fps60 fps
Selfie camera32 MP32 MP
4K selfie videoYesYes
Battery
Battery capacity7,000 mAh8,050 mAh
Battery typeSi/CSi/C
Active use (test)21.7 h24.6 h
Wired charging100 W100 W
Charged in 30 min72%60%
Wireless chargingYesYes
Wireless charging power50 W50 W
Reverse wireless chargingYesYes
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMYesYes
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth66
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-C 2.0USB Type-C 3.2
USB version23.2
Video output—Yes
Infrared portYesYes
Dual-band GPSYesYes
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavICGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC
Features
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5 mm headphone jackNoNo
Loudspeaker loudness-25.6 LUFS-26.1 LUFS
Fingerprint sensorUnder displayUnder display, ultrasonic
SensorsFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassFingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass
Software
OS at launchAndroid 16Android 16
PlatformAndroidAndroid
InterfaceHyperOS 3HyperOS 3
Major OS updates promised—4
EU label
Energy classAA
Battery charge cycles1,0001,000
Endurance per cycle71 h81 h
Repairability classCC
Drop resistance classBC
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare