How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. 15S Pro vs nubia RedMagic 10S Pro

Xiaomi 15S Pro vs ZTE nubia RedMagic 10S Pro

What 15S Pro does better (15) and where nubia RedMagic 10S Pro wins (5) — every spec side by side.

Xiaomi 15S Pro
Xiaomi · 202515S Pro
9.6Score
15 advantages≈ $730
Higher score
vs
ZTE nubia RedMagic 10S Pro
9.3Score
5 advantages≈ $700
8.9Display9.7
9.7Camera8.9
9.6Battery9.3
8.8Features7.7
Dimensions

Size comparison

15S Pronubia RedMagic 10S Pro
75.3 × 161.38.376.1 × 163.48.9
15S Pronubia RedMagic 10S ProDifference
Height161.3 mm163.4 mm−2.1 mm
Width75.3 mm76.1 mm−0.8 mm
Thickness8.3 mm8.9 mm−0.6 mm
Weight216 g229 g−13 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is 15S Pro better than nubia RedMagic 10S Pro?

  1. Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx42×
  2. Telephoto cameraYes · nubia RedMagic 10S Pro: No
  3. Wireless chargingYes · nubia RedMagic 10S Pro: No
  4. Peak brightness3,200 nits vs 2,000 nits+60%
  5. Wired charging90 W vs 80 W+12%
  6. Pixel density521 ppi vs 431 ppi+21%
  7. Storage (base)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
  8. Selfie camera32 MP vs 16 MP2×
  9. 4K selfie videoYes · nubia RedMagic 10S Pro: No
  10. Weight216 g vs 229 g+6%
  11. Rear cameras3 vs 2+50%
  12. Main camera aperturef/1.4 vs f/1.9+36%

Why is nubia RedMagic 10S Pro better than 15S Pro?

  1. RAM16 GB vs 24 GB+50%
  2. Battery capacity6,100 mAh vs 7,050 mAh+16%
  3. Refresh rate120 Hz vs 144 Hz+20%
  4. 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · 15S Pro: Yes
  5. CPU frequency3.9 GHz vs 4.47 GHz+15%
Specifications

Side by side

Xiaomi 15S ProXiaomi 15S Pro≈ $7309.6
Design
Weight216 g229 g
Thickness8.3 mm8.9 mm
Height161.3 mm163.4 mm
Width75.3 mm76.1 mm
Frame—Aluminium
BackGlassGlass
Ingress protectionIP68IP54
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8IPx4
Glass protectionShatterproof glass (2024 gen)Corning Gorilla Glass (unspecified version)
ColoursBlack, BlueNightfall (Matt Black), Moonlight (Silver Transparent), Dusk (Black Transparent)
Display
Screen size6.7″6.8″
PanelLTPO AMOLEDAMOLED
OLED panelYesYes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)Yes—
Resolution (width)1,440 px1,216 px
Resolution (height)3,200 px2,688 px
Pixel density521 ppi431 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz144 Hz
Peak brightness3,200 nits2,000 nits
Measured brightness941 nits—
Screen-to-body ratio90%91.4%
HDRYes—
Performance
ChipsetXring O1Qualcomm SM8750-AC Snapdragon 8 Elite
Chip makerXringQualcomm
Process3 nm3 nm
CPU cores108
CPU frequency3.9 GHz4.47 GHz
GPUImmortalis-G925 MP16Adreno 830
AnTuTu score2,998,904—
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)9,082—
3DMark Wild Life Extreme5,832—
Memory
RAM16 GB24 GB
Storage (max)1,024 GB1,024 GB
Storage (base)512 GB256 GB
Storage typeUFS 4.1UFS 4.1
Memory card slotNoNo
Camera
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.4f/1.9
Main sensor size1/1.31"1/1.55"
Rear cameras32
Optical stabilisationYesYes
Ultra-wide cameraYesYes
Telephoto cameraYesNo
Optical zoom5×—
Max video8K8K
4K video frame rate60 fps60 fps
Selfie camera32 MP16 MP
4K selfie videoYesNo
Battery
Battery capacity6,100 mAh7,050 mAh
Battery typeSi/CSi/C
Wired charging90 W80 W
Charged in 30 min75%—
Wireless chargingYesNo
Wireless charging power50 W—
Reverse wireless chargingYes—
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMNoNo
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.45.4
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-C 3.2 Gen2USB Type-C 3.2 Gen 2
USB version3.23.2
Video outputYesYes
Ultra WidebandYes—
Infrared portYes—
Dual-band GPSYesYes
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSSGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS
Features
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5 mm headphone jackNoYes
Loudspeaker loudness—-24.5 LUFS
Fingerprint sensorUnder display, ultrasonicUnder display
BarometerYes—
SensorsFingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass, barometerFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Software
OS at launchAndroid 15Android 15
PlatformAndroidAndroid
InterfaceHyperOS 2—
EU label
Energy class—A
Battery charge cycles—1,200
Endurance per cycle—80 h
Repairability class—C
Drop resistance class—C
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare