- android.gs
- Compare
- 15 Pro vs Axon 60 Ultra
Xiaomi 15 Pro vs ZTE Axon 60 Ultra
What 15 Pro does better (12) and where Axon 60 Ultra wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.0Display9.5
9.7Camera8.8
9.6Battery8.9
9.3Features9.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
15 ProAxon 60 Ultra
| 15 Pro | Axon 60 Ultra | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 161.3 mm | 163.6 mm | −2.3 mm |
| Width | 75.3 mm | 76 mm | −0.7 mm |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm | 9.1 mm | −0.7 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 15 Pro better than Axon 60 Ultra?
- Telephoto cameraYes · Axon 60 Ultra: No
- Wireless chargingYes · Axon 60 Ultra: No
- Wired charging90 W vs 80 W+12%
- CPU frequency4.32 GHz vs 3.2 GHz+35%
- 4K selfie videoYes · Axon 60 Ultra: No
- Pixel density522 ppi vs 453 ppi+15%
- Rear cameras3 vs 2+50%
- Process3 nm vs 4 nm+33%
- Resolution (width)1,440 px vs 1,260 px+14%
- Thickness8.4 mm vs 9.1 mm+8%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7 vs Wi-Fi 6E+8%
- USB version3.2 vs 3.1+3%
Why is Axon 60 Ultra better than 15 Pro?
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 512 GB2×
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 213 g | — |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm | 9.1 mm |
| Height | 161.3 mm | 163.6 mm |
| Width | 75.3 mm | 76 mm |
| Frame | — | Aluminium |
| Back | Glass | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Shatterproof glass (2024 gen) | — |
| Colours | Black, White, Silver, Green | Obsidian Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | LTPO AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | Yes | — |
| Resolution (width) | 1,440 px | 1,260 px |
| Resolution (height) | 3,200 px | 2,800 px |
| Pixel density | 522 ppi | 453 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 3,200 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.7% | 89.3% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8750-AB Snapdragon 8 Elite | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 3 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 4.32 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 830 | Adreno 740 |
| AnTuTu score | 2,995,695 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 8,637 | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 5,365 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage (max) | 1,024 GB | 1,024 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.4 | — |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.31" | — |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | No |
| Optical zoom | 5× | — |
| Max video | 8K | — |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,100 mAh | 6,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Si/C | — |
| Wired charging | 90 W | 80 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 68% | — |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging power | 50 W | — |
| Reverse wireless charging | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2 Gen2 | USB Type-C 3.1 |
| USB version | 3.2 | 3.1 |
| Video output | Yes | — |
| Satellite messaging | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared port | Yes | — |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display, ultrasonic | Under display |
| Barometer | Yes | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | HyperOS 2 | — |
