- android.gs
- Compare
- Y39 vs Poco C85 4G
Vivo Y39 vs Xiaomi Poco C85 4G
What Y39 does better (7) and where Poco C85 4G wins (7) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.2Display6.4
4.6Camera4.6
8.4Battery7.8
5.5Features5.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
Y39Poco C85 4G
| Y39 | Poco C85 4G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 165.7 mm | 171.6 mm | −5.9 mm |
| Width | 76.3 mm | 79.5 mm | −3.2 mm |
| Thickness | 8.3 mm | 8 mm | +0.3 mm |
| Weight | 205 g | 205 g | = |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Y39 better than Poco C85 4G?
- Stereo speakersYes · Poco C85 4G: No
- Wired charging44 W vs 33 W+33%
- Battery capacity6,500 mAh vs 6,000 mAh+8%
- Process4 nm vs 12 nm3×
- Peak brightness1,000 nits vs 810 nits+23%
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 2 GHz+10%
- Pixel density264 ppi vs 254 ppi+4%
Why is Poco C85 4G better than Y39?
- NFCNo · Y39: Yes
- Memory card slotNo · Y39: Yes
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · Y39: Yes
- Screen size6.7″ vs 6.9″+3%
- Charged in 30 min37% vs 48%+30%
- Bluetooth5 vs 5.4+8%
- Thickness8.3 mm vs 8 mm+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 205 g | 205 g |
| Thickness | 8.3 mm | 8 mm |
| Height | 165.7 mm | 171.6 mm |
| Width | 76.3 mm | 79.5 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | — |
| Ingress protection | IP64 | IP64 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx4 |
| Glass protection | Schott Glass | — |
| Colours | Lotus Purple, Ocean Blue | Purple, Black, Green |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.9″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 720 px | 720 px |
| Resolution (height) | 1,608 px | 1,600 px |
| Pixel density | 264 ppi | 254 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,000 nits | 810 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.9% | 84.3% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM4450 Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 | Mediatek Helio G81 Ultra |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 4 nm | 12 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 613 | Mali-G52 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 577,028 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,152 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/2.76" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,500 mAh | 6,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Si/C | — |
| Wired charging | 44 W | 33 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 37% | 48% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | — |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.4 |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass |
| SAR (head) | 0.99 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Funtouch 15 | HyperOS 2 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | — | A |
| Battery charge cycles | — | 1,000 |
| Endurance per cycle | — | 78 h |
| Repairability class | — | C |
| Drop resistance class | — | A |
