- android.gs
- Compare
- Y32 vs Redmi Note 17
Vivo Y32 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 17
What Y32 does better (4) and where Redmi Note 17 wins (14) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.0Display8.5
4.6Camera5.5
8.8Battery9.3
6.3Features6.6
Dimensions
Size comparison
Y32Redmi Note 17
| Y32 | Redmi Note 17 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 169.6 mm | 169.7 mm | −0.1 mm |
| Width | 79.2 mm | 79.1 mm | +0.1 mm |
| Thickness | 8.7 mm | 8.5 mm | +0.2 mm |
| Weight | 229 g | 225 g | +4 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Y32 better than Redmi Note 17?
- Stereo speakersYes · Redmi Note 17: No
- Battery capacity8,000 mAh vs 7,700 mAh+4%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx5+60%
- Bluetooth5.4 vs 5.1+6%
Why is Redmi Note 17 better than Y32?
- OLED panelNo · Y32: Yes
- Storage (max)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- 5GNo · Y32: Yes
- RAM6 GB vs 8 GB+33%
- Pixel density254 ppi vs 375 ppi+48%
- Peak brightness1,300 nits vs 1,800 nits+38%
- Wired charging44 W vs 45 W+2%
- Selfie camera8 MP vs 16 MP2×
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 2.3 GHz+5%
- Resolution (width)720 px vs 1,080 px+50%
- Process6 nm vs 4 nm+50%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 4 vs Wi-Fi 5+25%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 229 g | 225 g |
| Thickness | 8.7 mm | 8.5 mm |
| Height | 169.6 mm | 169.7 mm |
| Width | 79.2 mm | 79.1 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP65 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx5 |
| Glass protection | Schott Xensation Up | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i |
| Colours | Twilight Red, Sunset Orange | Celestial Purple, Sky Teal, Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.9″ | 7″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 720 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 1,592 px | 2,396 px |
| Pixel density | 254 ppi | 375 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,300 nits | 1,800 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85.1% | 88.4% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Unisoc T7300 | Qualcomm SM4450-AF Snapdragon 4 Gen 4 |
| Chip maker | Unisoc | Qualcomm |
| Process | 6 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.3 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP2 | Adreno 613 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 593,849 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 2,178 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 6 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/2.76" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 8,000 mAh | 7,700 mAh |
| Battery type | Si/C | Si/C |
| Active use (test) | — | 19.7 h |
| Wired charging | 44 W | 45 W |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 4 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.1 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 16 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | OriginOS 6 | HyperOS 3 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | — | B |
| Battery charge cycles | — | 1,000 |
| Endurance per cycle | — | 68 h |
| Repairability class | — | C |
| Drop resistance class | — | C |
