- android.gs
- Compare
- Y200 Pro vs Redmi Note 13
Vivo Y200 Pro vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 13
What Y200 Pro does better (5) and where Redmi Note 13 wins (11) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.3Display7.7
4.6Performance4.4
7.7Camera7.1
6.5Battery3.2
4.5Features5.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
Y200 ProRedmi Note 13
| Y200 Pro | Redmi Note 13 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 164.4 mm | 161.1 mm | +3.3 mm |
| Width | 74.9 mm | 75 mm | −0.1 mm |
| Thickness | 7.5 mm | 7.6 mm | −0.1 mm |
| Weight | 172 g | 174 g | −2 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Y200 Pro better than Redmi Note 13?
- AnTuTu score561,575 vs 405,118+39%
- Optical stabilisationYes · Redmi Note 13: No
- Wired charging44 W vs 33 W+33%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)2,201 vs 1,968+12%
- Peak brightness1,300 nits vs 1,000 nits+30%
Why is Redmi Note 13 better than Y200 Pro?
- Storage (max)128 GB vs 512 GB4×
- Main camera64 MP vs 108 MP+69%
- RAM8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
- NFCNo · Y200 Pro: Yes
- Memory card slotNo · Y200 Pro: Yes
- Rear cameras1 vs 22×
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · Y200 Pro: Yes
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · Y200 Pro: Yes
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz+9%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.7+6%
- Bluetooth5.1 vs 5.3+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 172 g | 174 g |
| Thickness | 7.5 mm | 7.6 mm |
| Height | 164.4 mm | 161.1 mm |
| Width | 74.9 mm | 75 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP54 | IP54 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx4 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Silk black, Silk green | Graphite black (Stealth Black), Arctic White, Ocean Teal, Prism Gold |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 388 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,300 nits | 1,000 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 991 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.1% | 88.9% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G | Mediatek Dimensity 6080 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 561,575 | 405,118 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,201 | 1,968 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 371 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | 108 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.7 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.67" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Active use (test) | — | 9.8 h |
| Wired charging | 44 W | 33 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 50% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.3 |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | GLONASS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -24 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.94 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Funtouch 14 | HyperOS |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 2 |
