android.gs
Compare
Y200 Pro vs Poco M7 Pro 5G

Vivo Y200 Pro vs Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G

What Y200 Pro does better (5) and where Poco M7 Pro 5G wins (13) — every spec side by side.

Vivo · 2024Y200 Pro

7.3Score

5 advantages≈ $300

Xiaomi · 2024Poco M7 Pro 5G

7.6Score

13 advantages≈ $300

Higher score

8.3Display8.3

4.6Performance4.9

7.7Camera7.4

6.5Battery5.4

4.5Features7.0

Dimensions

Size comparison

Y200 ProPoco M7 Pro 5G

	Y200 Pro	Poco M7 Pro 5G	Difference
Height	164.4 mm	162.4 mm	+2 mm
Width	74.9 mm	75.7 mm	−0.8 mm
Thickness	7.5 mm	8 mm	−0.5 mm
Weight	172 g	190 g	−18 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Y200 Pro better than Poco M7 Pro 5G?

AnTuTu score561,575 vs 470,807+19%
Main camera64 MP vs 50 MP+28%
Weight172 g vs 190 g+10%
Thickness7.5 mm vs 8 mm+7%
Screen-to-body ratio90.1% vs 87.4%+3%

Why is Poco M7 Pro 5G better than Y200 Pro?

Storage (max)128 GB vs 512 GB4×
RAM8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
NFCNo · Y200 Pro: Yes
Stereo speakersNo · Y200 Pro: Yes
Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 5,110 mAh+2%
Peak brightness1,300 nits vs 2,100 nits+62%
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)2,201 vs 2,322+5%
Wired charging44 W vs 45 W+2%
Memory card slotNo · Y200 Pro: Yes
3.5 mm headphone jackNo · Y200 Pro: Yes
CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 2.5 GHz+14%
Selfie camera16 MP vs 20 MP+25%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Vivo Y200 Pro≈ $3007.3	Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G≈ $3007.6
Design
Weight	172 g	190 g
Thickness	7.5 mm	8 mm
Height	164.4 mm	162.4 mm
Width	74.9 mm	75.7 mm
Frame	Plastic	Plastic
Back	Plastic	Plastic
Ingress protection	IP54	IP64
Water resistance (IPx)	IPx4	IPx4
Glass protection	—	Corning Gorilla Glass 5
Colours	Silk black, Silk green	Lavender Frost, Lunar Dust, Olive Twilight, Classic Black
Display
Screen size	6.8″	6.7″
Panel	AMOLED	AMOLED
OLED panel	Yes	Yes
Resolution (width)	1,080 px	1,080 px
Resolution (height)	2,400 px	2,400 px
Pixel density	388 ppi	395 ppi
Refresh rate	120 Hz	120 Hz
Peak brightness	1,300 nits	2,100 nits
Measured brightness	—	1,179 nits
Screen-to-body ratio	90.1%	87.4%
HDR	—	Yes
Performance
Chipset	Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G	Mediatek Dimensity 7025 Ultra
Chip maker	Qualcomm	MediaTek
Process	6 nm	6 nm
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	2.2 GHz	2.5 GHz
GPU	Adreno 619	IMG BXM-8-256
AnTuTu score	561,575	470,807
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	2,201	2,322
Memory
RAM	8 GB	12 GB
Storage (max)	128 GB	512 GB
Storage (base)	128 GB	128 GB
Storage type	UFS 2.2	UFS 2.2
Memory card slot	No	Yes
Camera
Main camera	64 MP	50 MP
Main camera aperture	f/1.8	f/1.5
Main sensor size	—	1/1.95"
Rear cameras	1	1
Optical stabilisation	Yes	Yes
Ultra-wide camera	No	No
Telephoto camera	No	No
Max video	1080p	1080p
Selfie camera	16 MP	20 MP
4K selfie video	No	No
Battery
Battery capacity	5,000 mAh	5,110 mAh
Battery type	Li-Po	Li-Po
Active use (test)	—	11.3 h
Wired charging	44 W	45 W
Charged in 30 min	—	58%
Wireless charging	No	No
Connectivity
5G	Yes	Yes
eSIM	No	No
Dual SIM	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 5	Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth	5.1	5
NFC	No	Yes
USB	USB Type-C	USB Type-C
USB version	2	2
Infrared port	—	Yes
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS
Features
Stereo speakers	No	Yes
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	Yes
Loudspeaker loudness	—	-23.3 LUFS
Fingerprint sensor	Under display	Under display
Sensors	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass
SAR (head)	—	0.86 W/kg
Software
OS at launch	Android 14	Android 14
Platform	Android	Android
Interface	Funtouch 14	HyperOS
Major OS updates promised	—	4
EU label
Energy class	—	D
Battery charge cycles	—	1,000
Endurance per cycle	—	38 h
Repairability class	—	C
Drop resistance class	—	D