android.gs
Compare
Y200 (China) vs Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G

Vivo Y200 (China) vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G

What Y200 (China) does better (6) and where Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G wins (10) — every spec side by side.

Vivo · 2024Y200 (China)

7.8Score

6 advantages≈ $220

Higher score

Xiaomi · 2024Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G

7.1Score

10 advantages≈ $220

8.3Display8.2

5.4Camera8.5

8.9Battery5.1

4.5Features4.6

Dimensions

Size comparison

Y200 (China)Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G

	Y200 (China)	Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G	Difference
Height	164.4 mm	161.1 mm	+3.3 mm
Width	74.8 mm	75 mm	−0.2 mm
Thickness	7.6 mm	8 mm	−0.4 mm
Weight	190 g	188 g	+2 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Y200 (China) better than Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G?

5GYes · Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G: No
Battery capacity6,000 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+20%
Wired charging80 W vs 67 W+19%
Max video4K vs 1080p
Process4 nm vs 6 nm+50%
Thickness7.6 mm vs 8 mm+5%

Why is Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G better than Y200 (China)?

Main camera50 MP vs 200 MP4×
Optical stabilisationNo · Y200 (China): Yes
NFCNo · Y200 (China): Yes
Memory card slotNo · Y200 (China): Yes
Rear cameras1 vs 22×
Ultra-wide cameraNo · Y200 (China): Yes
Selfie camera8 MP vs 16 MP2×
3.5 mm headphone jackNo · Y200 (China): Yes
Charged in 30 min62% vs 94%+52%
Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.7+6%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Vivo Y200 (China)≈ $2207.8	Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G≈ $2207.1
Design
Weight	190 g	188 g
Thickness	7.6 mm	8 mm
Height	164.4 mm	161.1 mm
Width	74.8 mm	75 mm
Frame	—	Plastic
Back	—	Plastic
Ingress protection	IP64	IP54
Water resistance (IPx)	IPx4	IPx4
Glass protection	—	Corning Gorilla Glass 5
Colours	Black, Silver, Orange	Midnight Black, Lavender Purple, Forest Green
Display
Screen size	6.8″	6.7″
Panel	AMOLED	AMOLED
OLED panel	Yes	Yes
Resolution (width)	1,080 px	1,080 px
Resolution (height)	2,400 px	2,400 px
Pixel density	388 ppi	395 ppi
Refresh rate	120 Hz	120 Hz
Peak brightness	1,300 nits	1,300 nits
Measured brightness	—	1,047 nits
Screen-to-body ratio	90.3%	88.9%
Performance
Chipset	Qualcomm SM6450 Snapdragon 6 Gen 1	Mediatek Helio G99 Ultra
Chip maker	Qualcomm	MediaTek
Process	4 nm	6 nm
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	2.2 GHz	2.2 GHz
GPU	Adreno 710	Mali-G57 MC2
AnTuTu score	—	382,881
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	—	1,844
Memory
RAM	12 GB	12 GB
Storage (max)	512 GB	512 GB
Storage (base)	128 GB	128 GB
Storage type	UFS 2.2	UFS 2.2
Memory card slot	No	Yes
Camera
Main camera	50 MP	200 MP
Main camera aperture	f/1.8	f/1.7
Main sensor size	1/1.95"	1/1.4"
Rear cameras	1	2
Optical stabilisation	No	Yes
Ultra-wide camera	No	Yes
Telephoto camera	No	No
Max video	4K	1080p
4K video frame rate	30 fps	—
Selfie camera	8 MP	16 MP
4K selfie video	No	No
Battery
Battery capacity	6,000 mAh	5,000 mAh
Battery type	—	Li-Po
Active use (test)	—	11.6 h
Wired charging	80 W	67 W
Charged in 30 min	62%	94%
Wireless charging	No	No
Connectivity
5G	Yes	No
eSIM	No	No
Dual SIM	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 5	Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth	5.1	5.2
NFC	No	Yes
USB	USB Type-C 2.0	USB Type-C 2.0
USB version	2	2
Infrared port	—	Yes
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS
Features
Stereo speakers	No	No
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	Yes
Loudspeaker loudness	—	-26.4 LUFS
Fingerprint sensor	Under display	Under display
Sensors	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass
SAR (head)	—	0.99 W/kg
Software
OS at launch	Android 14	Android 13
Platform	Android	Android
Interface	OriginOS 4	HyperOS
Major OS updates promised	—	3