android.gs
Compare
Y200 (Asia) vs Poco M7 Pro 5G

Vivo Y200 (Asia) vs Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G

What Y200 (Asia) does better (8) and where Poco M7 Pro 5G wins (7) — every spec side by side.

Vivo · 2024Y200 (Asia)

7.8Score

8 advantages≈ $300

Higher score

Xiaomi · 2024Poco M7 Pro 5G

7.6Score

7 advantages≈ $300

8.4Display8.3

6.8Camera7.4

7.4Battery5.4

5.5Features7.0

Dimensions

Size comparison

Y200 (Asia)Poco M7 Pro 5G

	Y200 (Asia)	Poco M7 Pro 5G	Difference
Height	163.2 mm	162.4 mm	+0.8 mm
Width	75.9 mm	75.7 mm	+0.2 mm
Thickness	7.8 mm	8 mm	−0.2 mm
Weight	188 g	190 g	−2 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Y200 (Asia) better than Poco M7 Pro 5G?

Wired charging80 W vs 45 W+78%
Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
Rear cameras2 vs 12×
Ultra-wide cameraYes · Poco M7 Pro 5G: No
Selfie camera32 MP vs 20 MP+60%
Process4 nm vs 6 nm+50%
Charged in 30 min80% vs 58%+38%
Thickness7.8 mm vs 8 mm+3%

Why is Poco M7 Pro 5G better than Y200 (Asia)?

Optical stabilisationNo · Y200 (Asia): Yes
NFCNo · Y200 (Asia): Yes
Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 5,110 mAh+2%
3.5 mm headphone jackNo · Y200 (Asia): Yes
Peak brightness1,800 nits vs 2,100 nits+17%
CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 2.5 GHz+14%
Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.5+20%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Vivo Y200 (Asia)≈ $3007.8	Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G≈ $3007.6
Design
Weight	188 g	190 g
Thickness	7.8 mm	8 mm
Height	163.2 mm	162.4 mm
Width	75.9 mm	75.7 mm
Frame	Plastic	Plastic
Back	Plastic	Plastic
Ingress protection	IP64	IP64
Water resistance (IPx)	IPx4	IPx4
Glass protection	—	Corning Gorilla Glass 5
Colours	Dynamic Black (Imperial Black), Titanium Silver, Dreamy Violet	Lavender Frost, Lunar Dust, Olive Twilight, Classic Black
Display
Screen size	6.7″	6.7″
Panel	AMOLED	AMOLED
OLED panel	Yes	Yes
Resolution (width)	1,080 px	1,080 px
Resolution (height)	2,400 px	2,400 px
Pixel density	395 ppi	395 ppi
Refresh rate	120 Hz	120 Hz
Peak brightness	1,800 nits	2,100 nits
Measured brightness	—	1,179 nits
Screen-to-body ratio	86.7%	87.4%
HDR	—	Yes
Performance
Chipset	Qualcomm SM4450 Snapdragon 4 Gen 2	Mediatek Dimensity 7025 Ultra
Chip maker	Qualcomm	MediaTek
Process	4 nm	6 nm
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	2.2 GHz	2.5 GHz
GPU	Adreno 613	IMG BXM-8-256
AnTuTu score	—	470,807
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	—	2,322
Memory
RAM	12 GB	12 GB
Storage (max)	512 GB	512 GB
Storage (base)	256 GB	128 GB
Storage type	UFS 2.2	UFS 2.2
Memory card slot	Yes	Yes
Camera
Main camera	50 MP	50 MP
Main camera aperture	f/1.8	f/1.5
Main sensor size	1/1.95"	1/1.95"
Rear cameras	2	1
Optical stabilisation	No	Yes
Ultra-wide camera	Yes	No
Telephoto camera	No	No
Max video	1080p	1080p
Selfie camera	32 MP	20 MP
4K selfie video	No	No
Battery
Battery capacity	5,000 mAh	5,110 mAh
Battery type	Li-Ion	Li-Po
Active use (test)	—	11.3 h
Wired charging	80 W	45 W
Charged in 30 min	80%	58%
Wireless charging	No	No
Connectivity
5G	Yes	Yes
eSIM	No	No
Dual SIM	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 5	Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth	5	5
NFC	No	Yes
USB	USB Type-C 2.0	USB Type-C
USB version	2	2
Infrared port	—	Yes
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS
Features
Stereo speakers	Yes	Yes
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	Yes
Loudspeaker loudness	—	-23.3 LUFS
Fingerprint sensor	Under display	Under display
Sensors	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass
SAR (head)	—	0.86 W/kg
Software
OS at launch	Android 14	Android 14
Platform	Android	Android
Interface	Funtouch 14	HyperOS
Major OS updates promised	—	4
EU label
Energy class	—	D
Battery charge cycles	—	1,000
Endurance per cycle	—	38 h
Repairability class	—	C
Drop resistance class	—	D