- android.gs
- Compare
- Y200 4G vs Poco C85 4G
Vivo Y200 4G vs Xiaomi Poco C85 4G
What Y200 4G does better (13) and where Poco C85 4G wins (5) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.4Display6.4
5.9Camera4.6
7.4Battery7.8
4.0Features5.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
Y200 4GPoco C85 4G
| Y200 4G | Poco C85 4G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 163.2 mm | 171.6 mm | −8.4 mm |
| Width | 75.9 mm | 79.5 mm | −3.6 mm |
| Thickness | 7.8 mm | 8 mm | −0.2 mm |
| Weight | 188 g | 205 g | −17 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Y200 4G better than Poco C85 4G?
- Wired charging80 W vs 33 W2.4×
- Peak brightness1,800 nits vs 810 nits2.2×
- OLED panelYes · Poco C85 4G: No
- Stereo speakersYes · Poco C85 4G: No
- Pixel density395 ppi vs 254 ppi+56%
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 8 MP4×
- CPU frequency2.8 GHz vs 2 GHz+40%
- Process6 nm vs 12 nm2×
- Weight188 g vs 205 g+9%
- Charged in 30 min80% vs 48%+67%
- Resolution (width)1,080 px vs 720 px+50%
- Screen-to-body ratio86.7% vs 84.3%+3%
Why is Poco C85 4G better than Y200 4G?
- NFCNo · Y200 4G: Yes
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 6,000 mAh+20%
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · Y200 4G: Yes
- Screen size6.7″ vs 6.9″+3%
- Bluetooth5 vs 5.4+8%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 188 g | 205 g |
| Thickness | 7.8 mm | 8 mm |
| Height | 163.2 mm | 171.6 mm |
| Width | 75.9 mm | 79.5 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | — |
| Ingress protection | IP64 | IP64 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx4 |
| Colours | Titanium Silver, Emerald Green | Purple, Black, Green |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.9″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 720 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 1,600 px |
| Pixel density | 395 ppi | 254 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,800 nits | 810 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86.7% | 84.3% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 685 | Mediatek Helio G81 Ultra |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 12 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.8 GHz | 2 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Mali-G52 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 448,509 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,524 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/2.76" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 6,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | — |
| Wired charging | 80 W | 33 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 80% | 48% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | — |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.4 |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Funtouch 14 | HyperOS 2 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | — | A |
| Battery charge cycles | — | 1,000 |
| Endurance per cycle | — | 78 h |
| Repairability class | — | C |
| Drop resistance class | — | A |
