- android.gs
- Compare
- Y11d vs Poco M7 4G
Vivo Y11d vs Xiaomi Poco M7 4G
What Y11d does better (7) and where Poco M7 4G wins (12) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.6Display7.4
4.1Camera4.6
8.4Battery8.3
4.1Features4.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
Y11dPoco M7 4G
| Y11d | Poco M7 4G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 167.4 mm | 171.1 mm | −3.7 mm |
| Width | 77.1 mm | 80.5 mm | −3.4 mm |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm | 8.6 mm | −0.2 mm |
| Weight | 209 g | 224 g | −15 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Y11d better than Poco M7 4G?
- Wired charging44 W vs 33 W+33%
- Peak brightness1,200 nits vs 850 nits+41%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx5 vs IPx4+25%
- 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · Poco M7 4G: No
- Weight209 g vs 224 g+7%
- Bluetooth5.2 vs 5+4%
- Thickness8.4 mm vs 8.6 mm+2%
Why is Poco M7 4G better than Y11d?
- Storage (max)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- NFCNo · Y11d: Yes
- RAM6 GB vs 8 GB+33%
- Battery capacity6,500 mAh vs 7,000 mAh+8%
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 144 Hz+20%
- Pixel density260 ppi vs 374 ppi+44%
- CPU frequency2 GHz vs 2.8 GHz+40%
- Process12 nm vs 6 nm2×
- Storage (base)64 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Screen size6.7″ vs 6.9″+2%
- Selfie camera5 MP vs 8 MP+60%
- Resolution (width)720 px vs 1,080 px+50%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 209 g | 224 g |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm | 8.6 mm |
| Height | 167.4 mm | 171.1 mm |
| Width | 77.1 mm | 80.5 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP65 | IP64 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx5 | IPx4 |
| Colours | Horizon White, Pearl Black | Chrome Silver, Aqua Blue, Carbon Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.9″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 720 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 1,600 px | 2,340 px |
| Pixel density | 260 ppi | 374 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,200 nits | 850 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85% | 84.9% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Unisoc T7225 | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 685 |
| Chip maker | Unisoc | Qualcomm |
| Process | 12 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MP1 | Adreno 610 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 482,788 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 1,519 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 6 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 64 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | eMMC 5.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 5 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,500 mAh | 7,000 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Si/C |
| Wired charging | 44 W | 33 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 38% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Reverse wireless charging | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | — | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5 |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.86 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | OriginOS 6 | HyperOS 2 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | — | B |
| Battery charge cycles | — | 1,000 |
| Endurance per cycle | — | 62 h |
| Repairability class | — | C |
| Drop resistance class | — | B |
