- android.gs
- Compare
- Y100 vs Poco X3 NFC
Vivo Y100 vs Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
What Y100 does better (13) and where Poco X3 NFC wins (8) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.3Display5.5
7.9Camera7.4
4.8Battery7.3
5.4Features4.6
Dimensions
Size comparison
Y100Poco X3 NFC
| Y100 | Poco X3 NFC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 158.9 mm | 165.3 mm | −6.4 mm |
| Width | 73.5 mm | 76.8 mm | −3.3 mm |
| Thickness | 7.7 mm | 9.4 mm | −1.7 mm |
| Weight | 181 g | 215 g | −34 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Y100 better than Poco X3 NFC?
- Peak brightness1,300 nits vs 450 nits2.9×
- OLED panelYes · Poco X3 NFC: No
- Optical stabilisationYes · Poco X3 NFC: No
- 5GYes · Poco X3 NFC: No
- Wired charging44 W vs 33 W+33%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx3+33%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 64 GB2×
- Weight181 g vs 215 g+19%
- Pixel density413 ppi vs 395 ppi+5%
- CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 2.3 GHz+4%
- Process6 nm vs 8 nm+33%
- Thickness7.7 mm vs 9.4 mm+22%
Why is Poco X3 NFC better than Y100?
- Stereo speakersNo · Y100: Yes
- Battery capacity4,500 mAh vs 5,160 mAh+15%
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 120 Hz+33%
- Rear cameras1 vs 22×
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · Y100: Yes
- Screen size6.4″ vs 6.7″+5%
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 20 MP+25%
- Charged in 30 min60% vs 62%+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 181 g | 215 g |
| Thickness | 7.7 mm | 9.4 mm |
| Height | 158.9 mm | 165.3 mm |
| Width | 73.5 mm | 76.8 mm |
| Frame | — | Aluminium |
| Back | Glass | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP54 | IP53 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx3 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Metal Black, Twilight Gold, Pacific Blue | Cobalt Blue, Shadow Gray |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.4″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 413 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,300 nits | 450 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 631 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.1% | 84.6% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 900 | Qualcomm SM7150-AC Snapdragon 732G |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 6 nm | 8 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2.3 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 | Adreno 618 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 283,750 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 1,777 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 336 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.73" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 20 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,500 mAh | 5,160 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 44 W | 33 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 60% | 62% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.1 |
| NFC | — | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -25.3 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.56 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 10 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Funtouch 13 | MIUI 14 |
