- android.gs
- Compare
- X90 vs 12 Pro
Vivo X90 vs Xiaomi 12 Pro
What X90 does better (5) and where 12 Pro wins (6) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
X9012 Pro
| X90 | 12 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 164.1 mm | 163.6 mm | +0.5 mm |
| Width | 74.4 mm | 74.6 mm | −0.2 mm |
| Thickness | 8.5 mm | 8.2 mm | +0.3 mm |
| Weight | 196 g | 204 g | −8 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is X90 better than 12 Pro?
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Battery capacity4,810 mAh vs 4,600 mAh+5%
- Weight196 g vs 204 g+4%
- Charged in 30 min188% vs 167%+13%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.9+6%
Why is 12 Pro better than X90?
- Wireless chargingNo · X90: Yes
- Max video4K vs 8K
- Pixel density452 ppi vs 521 ppi+15%
- Resolution (width)1,260 px vs 1,440 px+14%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 6E+8%
- Thickness8.5 mm vs 8.2 mm+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 196 g | 204 g |
| Thickness | 8.5 mm | 8.2 mm |
| Height | 164.1 mm | 163.6 mm |
| Width | 74.4 mm | 74.6 mm |
| Frame | — | Aluminium |
| Back | Glass | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP64 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | — |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Colours | Asteroid Black, Breeze Blue, Red | Gray, Blue, Purple, Green |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | LTPO AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | — | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,260 px | 1,440 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,800 px | 3,200 px |
| Pixel density | 452 ppi | 521 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 1,500 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 1,050 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 91.3% | 89.6% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9200 | Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3.05 GHz | 3 GHz |
| GPU | Immortalis-G715 MC11 | Adreno 730 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 985,226 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 3,682 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 2,479 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.49" | 1/1.28" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | Yes |
| Optical zoom | 2× | 2× |
| Max video | 4K | 8K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,810 mAh | 4,600 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 120 W | 120 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 188% | 167% |
| Wireless charging | No | Yes |
| Wireless charging power | — | 50 W |
| Reverse wireless charging | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -29.5 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Barometer | — | Yes |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.6 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 12 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Funtouch 13 (Global) | MIUI 13 |
