- android.gs
- Compare
- X90 Pro+ vs A41 Ultra
Vivo X90 Pro+ vs ZTE A41 Ultra
What X90 Pro+ does better (8) and where A41 Ultra wins (10) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
X90 Pro+A41 Ultra
| X90 Pro+ | A41 Ultra | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 164.4 mm | 161.9 mm | +2.5 mm |
| Width | 75.3 mm | 72.9 mm | +2.4 mm |
| Thickness | 9.7 mm | 8.5 mm | +1.2 mm |
| Weight | 221 g | 199 g | +22 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is X90 Pro+ better than A41 Ultra?
- Wireless chargingYes · A41 Ultra: No
- Stereo speakersYes · A41 Ultra: No
- Wired charging80 W vs 66 W+21%
- Pixel density517 ppi vs 395 ppi+31%
- CPU frequency3.2 GHz vs 3 GHz+7%
- Resolution (width)1,440 px vs 1,080 px+33%
- Rear cameras4 vs 3+33%
- USB version3.2 vs 3.1+3%
Why is A41 Ultra better than X90 Pro+?
- Battery capacity4,700 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+6%
- Main camera50 MP vs 64 MP+27%
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 144 Hz+20%
- Optical zoom3.5× vs 5×+43%
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · X90 Pro+: Yes
- Weight221 g vs 199 g+11%
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 44 MP+38%
- Thickness9.7 mm vs 8.5 mm+14%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 6E+8%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.7+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 221 g | 199 g |
| Thickness | 9.7 mm | 8.5 mm |
| Height | 164.4 mm | 161.9 mm |
| Width | 75.3 mm | 72.9 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Back | Eco leather | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Colours | Black, Red | Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | LTPO4 AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | Yes | — |
| Resolution (width) | 1,440 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 3,200 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 517 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,800 nits | — |
| Measured brightness | 1,123 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90% | 91% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 | Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3.2 GHz | 3 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 740 | Adreno 730 |
| AnTuTu score | 1,869,058 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 5,153 | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 3,688 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | — |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.7 |
| Main sensor size | 1" | 1/1.7" |
| Rear cameras | 4 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | Yes |
| Optical zoom | 3.5× | 5× |
| Max video | 8K | — |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 44 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,700 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Wired charging | 80 W | 66 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 91% | — |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging power | 50 W | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2 | USB Type-C 3.1 |
| USB version | 3.2 | 3.1 |
| Video output | Yes | — |
| Infrared port | Yes | — |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display, ultrasonic | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 12 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Funtouch (Global) | MyOS 12 |
