- android.gs
- Compare
- X90 Pro+ vs TC52
Vivo X90 Pro+ vs Zebra TC52
What X90 Pro+ does better (23) and where TC52 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
X90 Pro+TC52
| X90 Pro+ | TC52 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 164.4 mm | 155 mm | +9.4 mm |
| Width | 75.3 mm | 75.5 mm | −0.2 mm |
| Thickness | 9.7 mm | 18.6 mm | −8.9 mm |
| Weight | 221 g | 249 g | −28 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is X90 Pro+ better than TC52?
- RAM12 GB vs 4 GB3×
- Main camera50 MP vs 13 MP3.9×
- Peak brightness1,800 nits vs 600 nits3×
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 32 GB16×
- OLED panelYes · TC52: No
- Optical stabilisationYes · TC52: No
- Telephoto cameraYes · TC52: No
- 5GYes · TC52: No
- Stereo speakersYes · TC52: No
- Battery capacity4,700 mAh vs 4,100 mAh+15%
- CPU frequency3.2 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+45%
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 32 GB8×
Why is TC52 better than X90 Pro+?
- Memory card slotNo · X90 Pro+: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 221 g | 249 g |
| Thickness | 9.7 mm | 18.6 mm |
| Height | 164.4 mm | 155 mm |
| Width | 75.3 mm | 75.5 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | — |
| Back | Eco leather | — |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP67 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx7 |
| Glass protection | — | Gorilla Glass |
| Colours | Black, Red | Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 5″ |
| Panel | LTPO4 AMOLED | — |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | Yes | — |
| Resolution (width) | 1,440 px | 720 px |
| Resolution (height) | 3,200 px | 1,280 px |
| Pixel density | 517 ppi | — |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | — |
| Peak brightness | 1,800 nits | 600 nits |
| Measured brightness | 1,123 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90% | — |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 4 nm | — |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3.2 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 740 | Adreno 512 |
| AnTuTu score | 1,869,058 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 5,153 | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 3,688 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 4 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 32 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 32 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | — |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 13 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | — |
| Main sensor size | 1" | — |
| Rear cameras | 4 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | No |
| Optical zoom | 3.5× | — |
| Max video | 8K | — |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 5 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,700 mAh | 4,100 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Wired charging | 80 W | — |
| Charged in 30 min | 91% | — |
| Wireless charging | Yes | — |
| Wireless charging power | 50 W | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | No | — |
| Dual SIM | Yes | No |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 4.1 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2 | — |
| USB version | 3.2 | — |
| Video output | Yes | — |
| Infrared port | Yes | — |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | — |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display, ultrasonic | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | proximity, gyro, light |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Funtouch (Global) | — |
