- android.gs
- Compare
- X60 Pro+ vs Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
Vivo X60 Pro+ vs ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
What X60 Pro+ does better (4) and where Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition wins (17) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.8Display8.7
9.7Camera9.6
4.3Battery7.4
7.9Features9.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
X60 Pro+Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
| X60 Pro+ | Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 158.6 mm | 163.3 mm | −4.7 mm |
| Width | 73.4 mm | 73.6 mm | −0.2 mm |
| Thickness | 9.1 mm | 8.4 mm | +0.7 mm |
| Weight | 191 g | 204 g | −13 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is X60 Pro+ better than Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?
- Optical zoom5× vs 3.5×+43%
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 16 MP2×
- Weight191 g vs 204 g+7%
- Rear cameras4 vs 3+33%
Why is Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition better than X60 Pro+?
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 1,024 GB4×
- RAM12 GB vs 18 GB+50%
- Stereo speakersNo · X60 Pro+: Yes
- Wired charging55 W vs 80 W+45%
- Battery capacity4,200 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+19%
- Main camera50 MP vs 64 MP+28%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 512 GB4×
- 4K video frame rate60 fps vs 120 fps2×
- Peak brightness1,300 nits vs 1,500 nits+15%
- CPU frequency2.84 GHz vs 3 GHz+6%
- Screen size6.6″ vs 6.8″+4%
- USB version2 vs 3.1+55%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 191 g | 204 g |
| Thickness | 9.1 mm | 8.4 mm |
| Height | 158.6 mm | 163.3 mm |
| Width | 73.4 mm | 73.6 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Back | Eco leather | Ceramic |
| Colours | Orange, Emperor Blue | Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.6″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,116 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,376 px | 2,480 px |
| Pixel density | 398 ppi | 400 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,300 nits | 1,500 nits |
| Measured brightness | 816 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.8% | 92.9% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G | Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 5 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.84 GHz | 3 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 660 | Adreno 730 |
| AnTuTu score | 734,811 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 3,749 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 18 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 1,024 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.6 | f/1.6 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.31" | 1/1.7" |
| Rear cameras | 4 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | Yes |
| Optical zoom | 5× | 3.5× |
| Max video | 8K | 8K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 120 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,200 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 55 W | 80 W |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 3.1 |
| USB version | 2 | 3.1 |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, NavIC | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -27.6 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | 0.8 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 | Android 12 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Funtouch 12 (International) | MyOS 12 |
