- android.gs
- Compare
- X60 Pro+ vs Black Shark 4S Pro
Vivo X60 Pro+ vs Xiaomi Black Shark 4S Pro
What X60 Pro+ does better (9) and where Black Shark 4S Pro wins (10) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.8Display8.5
9.7Camera8.0
4.3Battery6.6
7.9Features8.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
X60 Pro+Black Shark 4S Pro
| X60 Pro+ | Black Shark 4S Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 158.6 mm | 163.7 mm | −5.1 mm |
| Width | 73.4 mm | 76.2 mm | −2.8 mm |
| Thickness | 9.1 mm | 9.9 mm | −0.8 mm |
| Weight | 191 g | 220 g | −29 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is X60 Pro+ better than Black Shark 4S Pro?
- Optical stabilisationYes · Black Shark 4S Pro: No
- Telephoto cameraYes · Black Shark 4S Pro: No
- Rear cameras4 vs 22×
- Max video8K vs 4K
- Weight191 g vs 220 g+15%
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 20 MP+60%
- Main camera aperturef/1.6 vs f/1.8+12%
- Thickness9.1 mm vs 9.9 mm+9%
- Screen-to-body ratio89.8% vs 86.1%+4%
Why is Black Shark 4S Pro better than X60 Pro+?
- Wired charging55 W vs 120 W2.2×
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 512 GB2×
- Stereo speakersNo · X60 Pro+: Yes
- RAM12 GB vs 16 GB+33%
- Battery capacity4,200 mAh vs 4,500 mAh+7%
- Main camera50 MP vs 64 MP+28%
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 144 Hz+20%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · X60 Pro+: Yes
- CPU frequency2.84 GHz vs 3 GHz+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 191 g | 220 g |
| Thickness | 9.1 mm | 9.9 mm |
| Height | 158.6 mm | 163.7 mm |
| Width | 73.4 mm | 76.2 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | — |
| Back | Eco leather | — |
| Colours | Orange, Emperor Blue | Black, White |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.6″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,376 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 398 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,300 nits | 1,300 nits |
| Measured brightness | 816 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.8% | 86.1% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888+ 5G |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.84 GHz | 3 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 660 | Adreno 660 |
| AnTuTu score | 734,811 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 3,749 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.6 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.31" | 1/1.97" |
| Rear cameras | 4 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | No |
| Optical zoom | 5× | — |
| Max video | 8K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 20 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,200 mAh | 4,500 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 55 W | 120 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 300% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, NavIC | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -27.6 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Barometer | — | Yes |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| SAR (head) | 0.8 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Funtouch 12 (International) | MIUI |
