- android.gs
- Compare
- X50e vs Redmi Note 9 Pro 5G
Vivo X50e vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro 5G
What X50e does better (8) and where Redmi Note 9 Pro 5G wins (7) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.2Display5.5
7.1Camera7.3
3.9Battery4.8
7.1Features6.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
X50eRedmi Note 9 Pro 5G
| X50e | Redmi Note 9 Pro 5G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 162.1 mm | 165.4 mm | −3.3 mm |
| Width | 75 mm | 76.8 mm | −1.8 mm |
| Thickness | 8.9 mm | 9 mm | −0.1 mm |
| Weight | 200 g | 215 g | −15 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is X50e better than Redmi Note 9 Pro 5G?
- OLED panelYes · Redmi Note 9 Pro 5G: No
- Telephoto cameraYes · Redmi Note 9 Pro 5G: No
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 16 MP2×
- CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+9%
- Weight200 g vs 215 g+7%
- Pixel density409 ppi vs 395 ppi+4%
- Rear cameras3 vs 2+50%
- Process7 nm vs 8 nm+14%
Why is Redmi Note 9 Pro 5G better than X50e?
- Main camera48 MP vs 108 MP2.2×
- Refresh rate60 Hz vs 120 Hz2×
- Storage (max)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Stereo speakersNo · X50e: Yes
- Battery capacity4,350 mAh vs 4,820 mAh+11%
- Screen size6.4″ vs 6.7″+4%
- Screen-to-body ratio82.4% vs 84.6%+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 200 g | 215 g |
| Thickness | 8.9 mm | 9 mm |
| Height | 162.1 mm | 165.4 mm |
| Width | 75 mm | 76.8 mm |
| Back | — | Glass |
| Ingress protection | — | IP53 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx3 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Black, Blue | Gray, Blue, Red/Mint |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.4″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 409 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 450 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 82.4% | 84.6% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G | Qualcomm SM7225 Snapdragon 750G 5G |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 7 nm | 8 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 620 | Adreno 619 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 48 MP | 108 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.0" | 1/1.52" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | No |
| Optical zoom | 2× | — |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,350 mAh | 4,820 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 33 W | 33 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 52% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Dual-band GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 10 | Android 10 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Funtouch 10 | MIUI 12 |
Related comparisons
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 ProvsXiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro 5G6.96.8
vs
Samsung Galaxy S10 LitevsXiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro 5G6.96.8
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro 5GvsRealme X76.86.7
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro 5GvsLG Velvet6.87.0
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro 5GvsMotorola One 5G6.86.8
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro 5GvsHTC U20 5G6.86.6

