- android.gs
- Compare
- X200T vs nubia Neo 5 Pro
Vivo X200T vs ZTE nubia Neo 5 Pro
What X200T does better (19) and where nubia Neo 5 Pro wins (0) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.3Display8.6
9.3Camera6.1
9.5Battery8.9
9.7Features7.3
Dimensions
Size comparison
X200Tnubia Neo 5 Pro
| X200T | nubia Neo 5 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 160 mm | 166.1 mm | −6.1 mm |
| Width | 74.3 mm | 78.8 mm | −4.5 mm |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 8.5 mm | −0.5 mm |
| Weight | 203 g | 210 g | −7 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is X200T better than nubia Neo 5 Pro?
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx42×
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Optical stabilisationYes · nubia Neo 5 Pro: No
- Telephoto cameraYes · nubia Neo 5 Pro: No
- Wireless chargingYes · nubia Neo 5 Pro: No
- Battery capacity6,200 mAh vs 6,000 mAh+3%
- Wired charging90 W vs 80 W+12%
- Rear cameras3 vs 13×
- CPU frequency3.63 GHz vs 2.7 GHz+34%
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · nubia Neo 5 Pro: No
- 4K video frame rate60 fps vs 30 fps2×
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 16 MP2×
Why is nubia Neo 5 Pro better than X200T?
nubia Neo 5 Pro has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 203 g | 210 g |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 8.5 mm |
| Height | 160 mm | 166.1 mm |
| Width | 74.3 mm | 78.8 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | — |
| Back | Glass | — |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP64 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx4 |
| Glass protection | Schott Xensation Core | — |
| Colours | Seaside Lilac, Stellar Black | Gray |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,260 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,800 px | 2,392 px |
| Pixel density | 460 ppi | 387 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 5,000 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.4% | 85.3% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ | Unisoc T9100 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Unisoc |
| Process | 3 nm | — |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3.63 GHz | 2.7 GHz |
| GPU | Immortalis-G925 | Mali-G57 |
| AnTuTu score | 2,725,989 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 8,430 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.1 | — |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.6 | — |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | — |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | No |
| Optical zoom | 3× | — |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,200 mAh | 6,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Si/C | — |
| Wired charging | 90 W | 80 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 70% | — |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging power | 40 W | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 4 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | — |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | — |
| Video output | Yes | — |
| Infrared port | Yes | — |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display, ultrasonic | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, proximity |
| SAR (head) | 1.09 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 16 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | OriginOS 6 | MyOS 16 |
| Major OS updates promised | 5 | — |
