How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. X200T vs Redmi Note 17 Pro Max

Vivo X200T vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max

What X200T does better (14) and where Redmi Note 17 Pro Max wins (5) — every spec side by side.

Vivo X200T
Vivo · 2026X200T
9.6Score
14 advantages≈ $590
Higher score
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max
Xiaomi · 2026Redmi Note 17 Pro Max
9.3Score
5 advantages≈ $530
9.3Display9.4
9.0Performance6.7
9.3Camera8.3
9.5Battery9.7
9.7Features9.5
Dimensions

Size comparison

X200TRedmi Note 17 Pro Max
74.3 × 160878.3 × 163.48.6
X200TRedmi Note 17 Pro MaxDifference
Height160 mm163.4 mm−3.4 mm
Width74.3 mm78.3 mm−4 mm
Thickness8 mm8.6 mm−0.6 mm
Weight203 g230 g−26 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is X200T better than Redmi Note 17 Pro Max?

  1. AnTuTu score2,725,989 vs 841,7073.2×
  2. Geekbench 6 (multi-core)8,430 vs 3,0702.7×
  3. Telephoto cameraYes · Redmi Note 17 Pro Max: No
  4. Wireless chargingYes · Redmi Note 17 Pro Max: No
  5. Peak brightness5,000 nits vs 3,500 nits+43%
  6. CPU frequency3.63 GHz vs 2.6 GHz+40%
  7. Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
  8. 4K video frame rate60 fps vs 30 fps2×
  9. Weight203 g vs 230 g+13%
  10. Pixel density460 ppi vs 447 ppi+3%
  11. Rear cameras3 vs 2+50%
  12. Process3 nm vs 4 nm+33%

Why is Redmi Note 17 Pro Max better than X200T?

  1. Battery capacity6,200 mAh vs 9,210 mAh+49%
  2. Wired charging90 W vs 100 W+11%
  3. Screen size6.7″ vs 6.8″+2%
  4. Bluetooth5.4 vs 6+11%
  5. Main camera aperturef/1.6 vs f/1.5+7%
Specifications

Side by side

Vivo X200TVivo X200T≈ $5909.6
Design
Weight203 g230 g
Thickness8 mm8.6 mm
Height160 mm163.4 mm
Width74.3 mm78.3 mm
FrameAluminiumPlastic
BackGlassPlastic
Ingress protectionIP68IP68
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8IPx8
Glass protectionSchott Xensation CoreCorning Gorilla Glass Victus 2
ColoursSeaside Lilac, Stellar BlackBlack, Purple, Cloud Blush, Green, Secret Sunrise
Display
Screen size6.7″6.8″
PanelAMOLEDAMOLED
OLED panelYesYes
Resolution (width)1,260 px1,280 px
Resolution (height)2,800 px2,772 px
Pixel density460 ppi447 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness5,000 nits3,500 nits
Measured brightness—1,109 nits
Screen-to-body ratio90.4%89.5%
HDRYesYes
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 9400+Qualcomm SM6850 Snapdragon 6 Gen 5
Chip makerMediaTekQualcomm
Process3 nm4 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency3.63 GHz2.6 GHz
GPUImmortalis-G925Adreno 812
AnTuTu score2,725,989841,707
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)8,4303,070
3DMark Wild Life Extreme—1,190
Memory
RAM12 GB12 GB
Storage (max)512 GB512 GB
Storage (base)256 GB128 GB
Storage typeUFS 4.1UFS 2.2
Memory card slotNoNo
Camera
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.6f/1.5
Main sensor size1/1.56"1/1.95"
Rear cameras32
Optical stabilisationYesYes
Ultra-wide cameraYesYes
Telephoto cameraYesNo
Optical zoom3×—
Max video4K4K
4K video frame rate60 fps30 fps
Selfie camera32 MP32 MP
4K selfie videoYesYes
Battery
Battery capacity6,200 mAh9,210 mAh
Battery typeSi/CSi/C
Active use (test)—22.5 h
Wired charging90 W100 W
Charged in 30 min70%—
Wireless chargingYesNo
Wireless charging power40 W—
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMYesYes
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 6
Bluetooth5.46
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-C 2.0USB Type-C 2.0
USB version22
Video outputYes—
Infrared portYes—
Dual-band GPSYes—
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavICGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS
Features
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5 mm headphone jackNoNo
Loudspeaker loudness—-24.3 LUFS
Fingerprint sensorUnder display, ultrasonicUnder display
SensorsFingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, proximity
SAR (head)1.09 W/kg—
Software
OS at launchAndroid 16Android 16
PlatformAndroidAndroid
InterfaceOriginOS 6HyperOS 3
Major OS updates promised5—
EU label
Energy class—B
Battery charge cycles—1,000
Endurance per cycle—79 h
Repairability class—C
Drop resistance class—A
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare