How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. X200T vs Poco X8 Pro Max

Vivo X200T vs Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max

What X200T does better (11) and where Poco X8 Pro Max wins (6) — every spec side by side.

Vivo X200T
Vivo · 2026X200T
9.6Score
11 advantages≈ $590
vs
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max
Xiaomi · 2026Poco X8 Pro Max
9.6Score
6 advantages≈ $500
Higher score
9.3Display9.4
9.0Performance9.0
9.3Camera8.8
9.5Battery9.7
9.7Features9.7
Dimensions

Size comparison

X200TPoco X8 Pro Max
74.3 × 160877.9 × 162.98.2
X200TPoco X8 Pro MaxDifference
Height160 mm162.9 mm−2.9 mm
Width74.3 mm77.9 mm−3.6 mm
Thickness8 mm8.2 mm−0.2 mm
Weight203 g218 g−15 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is X200T better than Poco X8 Pro Max?

  1. Telephoto cameraYes · Poco X8 Pro Max: No
  2. Wireless chargingYes · Poco X8 Pro Max: No
  3. AnTuTu score2,725,989 vs 2,445,108+11%
  4. Peak brightness5,000 nits vs 3,500 nits+43%
  5. 4K selfie videoYes · Poco X8 Pro Max: No
  6. Weight203 g vs 218 g+7%
  7. Pixel density460 ppi vs 447 ppi+3%
  8. Selfie camera32 MP vs 20 MP+60%
  9. Rear cameras3 vs 2+50%
  10. Charged in 30 min70% vs 62%+13%
  11. Thickness8 mm vs 8.2 mm+2%

Why is Poco X8 Pro Max better than X200T?

  1. Battery capacity6,200 mAh vs 8,500 mAh+37%
  2. Wired charging90 W vs 100 W+11%
  3. CPU frequency3.63 GHz vs 3.73 GHz+3%
  4. Screen size6.7″ vs 6.8″+2%
  5. Bluetooth5.4 vs 6+11%
  6. Main camera aperturef/1.6 vs f/1.5+7%
Specifications

Side by side

Vivo X200TVivo X200T≈ $5909.6
Design
Weight203 g218 g
Thickness8 mm8.2 mm
Height160 mm162.9 mm
Width74.3 mm77.9 mm
FrameAluminiumAluminium
BackGlassPlastic
Ingress protectionIP68IP68
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8IPx8
Glass protectionSchott Xensation CoreCorning Gorilla Glass 7i
ColoursSeaside Lilac, Stellar BlackBlack, White, Blue
Display
Screen size6.7″6.8″
PanelAMOLEDAMOLED
OLED panelYesYes
Resolution (width)1,260 px1,280 px
Resolution (height)2,800 px2,772 px
Pixel density460 ppi447 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness5,000 nits3,500 nits
Measured brightness—1,114 nits
Screen-to-body ratio90.4%90.3%
HDRYesYes
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 9400+Mediatek Dimensity 9500s
Chip makerMediaTekMediaTek
Process3 nm3 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency3.63 GHz3.73 GHz
GPUImmortalis-G925Immortalis-G925 MC11
AnTuTu score2,725,9892,445,108
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)8,4308,539
3DMark Wild Life Extreme—6,229
Memory
RAM12 GB12 GB
Storage (max)512 GB512 GB
Storage (base)256 GB256 GB
Storage typeUFS 4.1UFS 4.1
Memory card slotNoNo
Camera
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.6f/1.5
Main sensor size1/1.56"1/1.95"
Rear cameras32
Optical stabilisationYesYes
Ultra-wide cameraYesYes
Telephoto cameraYesNo
Optical zoom3×—
Max video4K4K
4K video frame rate60 fps60 fps
Selfie camera32 MP20 MP
4K selfie videoYesNo
Battery
Battery capacity6,200 mAh8,500 mAh
Battery typeSi/CSi/C
Active use (test)—25.4 h
Wired charging90 W100 W
Charged in 30 min70%62%
Wireless chargingYesNo
Wireless charging power40 W—
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMYesYes
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.46
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-C 2.0USB Type-C 2.0
USB version22
Video outputYes—
Infrared portYesYes
Dual-band GPSYesYes
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavICGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC
Features
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5 mm headphone jackNoNo
Loudspeaker loudness—-20.9 LUFS
Fingerprint sensorUnder display, ultrasonicUnder display, ultrasonic
SensorsFingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassFingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, compass, proximity
SAR (head)1.09 W/kg—
Software
OS at launchAndroid 16Android 16
PlatformAndroidAndroid
InterfaceOriginOS 6HyperOS 3
Major OS updates promised5—
EU label
Energy class—B
Battery charge cycles—1,000
Endurance per cycle—80 h
Repairability class—C
Drop resistance class—B
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare