android.gs
Compare
X200T vs 17T Pro

Vivo X200T vs Xiaomi 17T Pro

What X200T does better (5) and where 17T Pro wins (15) — every spec side by side.

Vivo · 2026X200T

9.6Score

5 advantages≈ $590

Xiaomi · 202617T Pro

9.7Score

15 advantages≈ $590

Higher score

9.3Display9.7

9.0Performance9.4

9.3Camera9.8

9.5Battery9.8

9.7Features9.7

Dimensions

Size comparison

X200T17T Pro

	X200T	17T Pro	Difference
Height	160 mm	162.2 mm	−2.2 mm
Width	74.3 mm	77.5 mm	−3.2 mm
Thickness	8 mm	8.3 mm	−0.3 mm
Weight	203 g	219 g	−16 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is X200T better than 17T Pro?

Peak brightness5,000 nits vs 3,500 nits+43%
Weight203 g vs 219 g+8%
Pixel density460 ppi vs 447 ppi+3%
Main camera aperturef/1.6 vs f/1.7+6%
Thickness8 mm vs 8.3 mm+4%

Why is 17T Pro better than X200T?

Storage (max)512 GB vs 1,024 GB2×
Battery capacity6,200 mAh vs 7,000 mAh+13%
RAM12 GB vs 16 GB+33%
Optical zoom3× vs 5×+67%
AnTuTu score2,725,989 vs 2,795,030+3%
Refresh rate120 Hz vs 144 Hz+20%
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)8,430 vs 9,766+16%
Wired charging90 W vs 100 W+11%
Max video4K vs 8K
4K video frame rate60 fps vs 120 fps2×
CPU frequency3.63 GHz vs 4.21 GHz+16%
Screen size6.7″ vs 6.8″+2%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Vivo X200T≈ $5909.6	Xiaomi 17T Pro≈ $5909.7
Design
Weight	203 g	219 g
Thickness	8 mm	8.3 mm
Height	160 mm	162.2 mm
Width	74.3 mm	77.5 mm
Frame	Aluminium	Aluminium
Back	Glass	Glass
Ingress protection	IP68	IP68
Water resistance (IPx)	IPx8	IPx8
Glass protection	Schott Xensation Core	Corning Gorilla Glass 7i
Colours	Seaside Lilac, Stellar Black	Deep Blue, Deep Violet, Black
Display
Screen size	6.7″	6.8″
Panel	AMOLED	AMOLED
OLED panel	Yes	Yes
Resolution (width)	1,260 px	1,280 px
Resolution (height)	2,800 px	2,772 px
Pixel density	460 ppi	447 ppi
Refresh rate	120 Hz	144 Hz
Peak brightness	5,000 nits	3,500 nits
Measured brightness	—	1,069 nits
Screen-to-body ratio	90.4%	91.1%
HDR	Yes	Yes
Performance
Chipset	Mediatek Dimensity 9400+	Mediatek Dimensity 9500
Chip maker	MediaTek	MediaTek
Process	3 nm	3 nm
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	3.63 GHz	4.21 GHz
GPU	Immortalis-G925	Mali-G1 Ultra MC12
AnTuTu score	2,725,989	2,795,030
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	8,430	9,766
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	—	6,939
Memory
RAM	12 GB	16 GB
Storage (max)	512 GB	1,024 GB
Storage (base)	256 GB	256 GB
Storage type	UFS 4.1	UFS 4.1
Memory card slot	No	No
Camera
Main camera	50 MP	50 MP
Main camera aperture	f/1.6	f/1.7
Main sensor size	1/1.56"	1/1.31"
Rear cameras	3	3
Optical stabilisation	Yes	Yes
Ultra-wide camera	Yes	Yes
Telephoto camera	Yes	Yes
Optical zoom	3×	5×
Max video	4K	8K
4K video frame rate	60 fps	120 fps
Selfie camera	32 MP	32 MP
4K selfie video	Yes	Yes
Battery
Battery capacity	6,200 mAh	7,000 mAh
Battery type	Si/C	Si/C
Active use (test)	—	21.7 h
Wired charging	90 W	100 W
Charged in 30 min	70%	72%
Wireless charging	Yes	Yes
Wireless charging power	40 W	50 W
Reverse wireless charging	—	Yes
Connectivity
5G	Yes	Yes
eSIM	Yes	Yes
Dual SIM	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 7	Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth	5.4	6
NFC	Yes	Yes
USB	USB Type-C 2.0	USB Type-C 2.0
USB version	2	2
Video output	Yes	—
Infrared port	Yes	Yes
Dual-band GPS	Yes	Yes
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC
Features
Stereo speakers	Yes	Yes
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	No
Loudspeaker loudness	—	-25.6 LUFS
Fingerprint sensor	Under display, ultrasonic	Under display
Sensors	Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
SAR (head)	1.09 W/kg	—
Software
OS at launch	Android 16	Android 16
Platform	Android	Android
Interface	OriginOS 6	HyperOS 3
Major OS updates promised	5	—
EU label
Energy class	—	A
Battery charge cycles	—	1,000
Endurance per cycle	—	71 h
Repairability class	—	C
Drop resistance class	—	B