How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. X200T vs 17T

Vivo X200T vs Xiaomi 17T

What X200T does better (11) and where 17T wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Vivo X200T
Vivo · 2026X200T
9.6Score
11 advantages≈ $590
Higher score
vs
Xiaomi 17T
Xiaomi · 202617T
9.5Score
3 advantages≈ $550
9.3Display8.9
9.0Performance8.3
9.3Camera9.6
9.5Battery9.1
9.7Features9.6
Dimensions

Size comparison

X200T17T
74.3 × 160875.2 × 157.68.2
X200T17TDifference
Height160 mm157.6 mm+2.4 mm
Width74.3 mm75.2 mm−0.9 mm
Thickness8 mm8.2 mm−0.2 mm
Weight203 g200 g+3 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is X200T better than 17T?

  1. AnTuTu score2,725,989 vs 1,640,834+66%
  2. Wireless chargingYes · 17T: No
  3. Wired charging90 W vs 67 W+34%
  4. Geekbench 6 (multi-core)8,430 vs 6,607+28%
  5. Peak brightness5,000 nits vs 3,500 nits+43%
  6. CPU frequency3.63 GHz vs 3.4 GHz+7%
  7. Process3 nm vs 4 nm+33%
  8. Charged in 30 min70% vs 55%+27%
  9. Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7 vs Wi-Fi 6E+8%
  10. Main camera aperturef/1.6 vs f/1.7+6%
  11. Thickness8 mm vs 8.2 mm+2%

Why is 17T better than X200T?

  1. Battery capacity6,200 mAh vs 6,500 mAh+5%
  2. Optical zoom3× vs 5×+67%
  3. Bluetooth5.4 vs 6+11%
Specifications

Side by side

Vivo X200TVivo X200T≈ $5909.6
Xiaomi 17TXiaomi 17T≈ $5509.5
Design
Weight203 g200 g
Thickness8 mm8.2 mm
Height160 mm157.6 mm
Width74.3 mm75.2 mm
FrameAluminiumPlastic
BackGlassGlass
Ingress protectionIP68IP68
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8IPx8
Glass protectionSchott Xensation CoreCorning Gorilla Glass 7i
ColoursSeaside Lilac, Stellar BlackViolet, Blue, Opal White, Black
Display
Screen size6.7″6.6″
PanelAMOLEDAMOLED
OLED panelYesYes
Resolution (width)1,260 px1,268 px
Resolution (height)2,800 px2,756 px
Pixel density460 ppi460 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness5,000 nits3,500 nits
Measured brightness—1,035 nits
Screen-to-body ratio90.4%89.8%
HDRYesYes
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 9400+Mediatek Dimensity 8500 Ultra
Chip makerMediaTekMediaTek
Process3 nm4 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency3.63 GHz3.4 GHz
GPUImmortalis-G925Mali-G720 MC8
AnTuTu score2,725,9891,640,834
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)8,4306,607
3DMark Wild Life Extreme—3,563
Memory
RAM12 GB12 GB
Storage (max)512 GB512 GB
Storage (base)256 GB256 GB
Storage typeUFS 4.1UFS 4.1
Memory card slotNoNo
Camera
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.6f/1.7
Main sensor size1/1.56"1/1.55"
Rear cameras33
Optical stabilisationYesYes
Ultra-wide cameraYesYes
Telephoto cameraYesYes
Optical zoom3×5×
Max video4K4K
4K video frame rate60 fps60 fps
Selfie camera32 MP32 MP
4K selfie videoYesYes
Battery
Battery capacity6,200 mAh6,500 mAh
Battery typeSi/CSi/C
Active use (test)—17.3 h
Wired charging90 W67 W
Charged in 30 min70%55%
Wireless chargingYesNo
Wireless charging power40 W—
Reverse wireless charging—Yes
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMYesYes
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 6E
Bluetooth5.46
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-C 2.0USB Type-C 2.0
USB version22
Video outputYes—
Infrared portYesYes
Dual-band GPSYesYes
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavICGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC
Features
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5 mm headphone jackNoNo
Loudspeaker loudness—-24.6 LUFS
Fingerprint sensorUnder display, ultrasonicUnder display
SensorsFingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
SAR (head)1.09 W/kg—
Software
OS at launchAndroid 16Android 16
PlatformAndroidAndroid
InterfaceOriginOS 6HyperOS 3
Major OS updates promised5—
EU label
Energy class—A
Battery charge cycles—1,000
Endurance per cycle—66 h
Repairability class—C
Drop resistance class—B
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare