How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. X200s vs nubia RedMagic 10 Air

Vivo X200s vs ZTE nubia RedMagic 10 Air

What X200s does better (21) and where nubia RedMagic 10 Air wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Vivo X200s
Vivo · 2025X200s
9.6Score
21 advantages≈ $550
Higher score
vs
ZTE nubia RedMagic 10 Air
9.1Score
1 advantage≈ $580
9.3Display9.1
9.2Performance8.7
9.3Camera8.9
9.5Battery7.7
9.5Features7.3
Dimensions

Size comparison

X200snubia RedMagic 10 Air
74.3 × 160876.6 × 164.37.9
X200snubia RedMagic 10 AirDifference
Height160 mm164.3 mm−4.3 mm
Width74.3 mm76.6 mm−2.3 mm
Thickness8 mm7.9 mm+0.1 mm
Weight203 g205 g−2 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is X200s better than nubia RedMagic 10 Air?

  1. AnTuTu score2,830,117 vs 1,881,709+50%
  2. Peak brightness5,000 nits vs 1,600 nits3.1×
  3. Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx42×
  4. Storage (max)1,024 GB vs 512 GB2×
  5. Telephoto cameraYes · nubia RedMagic 10 Air: No
  6. Wireless chargingYes · nubia RedMagic 10 Air: No
  7. Geekbench 6 (multi-core)9,258 vs 7,129+30%
  8. Battery capacity6,200 mAh vs 6,000 mAh+3%
  9. Wired charging90 W vs 80 W+12%
  10. Major OS updates promised4 vs 3+33%
  11. 3DMark Wild Life Extreme5,777 vs 4,624+25%
  12. Selfie camera32 MP vs 16 MP2×

Why is nubia RedMagic 10 Air better than X200s?

  1. Max video4K vs 8K
Specifications

Side by side

Vivo X200sVivo X200s≈ $5509.6
Design
Weight203 g205 g
Thickness8 mm7.9 mm
Height160 mm164.3 mm
Width74.3 mm76.6 mm
Frame—Aluminium
BackGlassGlass
Ingress protectionIP68IP54
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8IPx4
Glass protection—Corning Gorilla Glass 5
ColoursGray, Silver, Mint, PurpleBlack Twilight, White Hailstone, Orange Flare
Display
Screen size6.7″6.8″
PanelAMOLEDAMOLED
OLED panelYesYes
Resolution (width)1,260 px1,116 px
Resolution (height)2,800 px2,480 px
Pixel density460 ppi400 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness5,000 nits1,600 nits
Measured brightness—1,023 nits
Screen-to-body ratio90.4%88.7%
HDRYes—
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 9400+Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
Chip makerMediaTekQualcomm
Process3 nm4 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency3.73 GHz3.3 GHz
GPUImmortalis-G925Adreno 750
AnTuTu score2,830,1171,881,709
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)9,2587,129
3DMark Wild Life Extreme5,7774,624
Memory
RAM16 GB16 GB
Storage (max)1,024 GB512 GB
Storage (base)256 GB256 GB
Storage typeUFS 4.1UFS 4.0
Memory card slotNoNo
Camera
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.6f/1.9
Main sensor size1/1.56"1/1.55"
Rear cameras32
Optical stabilisationYesYes
Ultra-wide cameraYesYes
Telephoto cameraYesNo
Optical zoom3×—
Max video4K8K
4K video frame rate60 fps60 fps
Selfie camera32 MP16 MP
4K selfie videoYesNo
Battery
Battery capacity6,200 mAh6,000 mAh
Battery typeSi/CLi-Po
Active use (test)—13.2 h
Wired charging90 W80 W
Charged in 30 min70%58%
Wireless chargingYesNo
Wireless charging power40 W—
Reverse wireless chargingYes—
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMYesNo
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.45.4
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-C 2.0USB Type-C 2.0
USB version22
Video outputYes—
Infrared portYesYes
Dual-band GPSYesYes
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavICGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS
Features
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5 mm headphone jackNoNo
Loudspeaker loudness—-25.7 LUFS
Fingerprint sensorUnder display, ultrasonicUnder display
SensorsFingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Software
OS at launchAndroid 15Android 15
PlatformAndroidAndroid
InterfaceFuntouch 15 (International)Redmagic OS 10
Major OS updates promised43
EU label
Energy class—B
Battery charge cycles—1,000
Endurance per cycle—58 h
Repairability class—B
Drop resistance class—D
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare