android.gs
Compare
X100 Ultra vs nubia RedMagic 8S Pro

Vivo X100 Ultra vs ZTE nubia RedMagic 8S Pro

What X100 Ultra does better (16) and where nubia RedMagic 8S Pro wins (4) — every spec side by side.

Vivo · 2024X100 Ultra

9.5Score

16 advantages≈ $660

Higher score

ZTE · 2023nubia RedMagic 8S Pro

9.1Score

4 advantages≈ $700

9.0Display8.5

8.7Performance8.2

9.7Camera7.8

7.8Battery8.9

9.7Features9.2

Dimensions

Size comparison

X100 Ultranubia RedMagic 8S Pro

	X100 Ultra	nubia RedMagic 8S Pro	Difference
Height	164.1 mm	164 mm	+0.1 mm
Width	75.6 mm	76.4 mm	−0.8 mm
Thickness	9.2 mm	9.5 mm	−0.3 mm
Weight	229 g	228 g	+1 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is X100 Ultra better than nubia RedMagic 8S Pro?

AnTuTu score2,152,790 vs 1,326,652+62%
Peak brightness3,000 nits vs 1,300 nits2.3×
Measured brightness1,801 nits vs 784 nits2.3×
Storage (max)1,024 GB vs 512 GB2×
Optical stabilisationYes · nubia RedMagic 8S Pro: No
Telephoto cameraYes · nubia RedMagic 8S Pro: No
Wireless chargingYes · nubia RedMagic 8S Pro: No
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)6,311 vs 5,129+23%
Selfie camera50 MP vs 16 MP3.1×
Pixel density517 ppi vs 400 ppi+29%
Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
4K video frame rate120 fps vs 60 fps2×

Why is nubia RedMagic 8S Pro better than X100 Ultra?

Battery capacity5,500 mAh vs 6,000 mAh+9%
3.5 mm headphone jackNo · X100 Ultra: Yes
Charged in 30 min65% vs 86%+32%
Loudspeaker loudness-26.2 LUFS vs -24.3 LUFS+-7%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Vivo X100 Ultra≈ $6609.5	ZTE nubia RedMagic 8S Pro≈ $7009.1
Design
Weight	229 g	228 g
Thickness	9.2 mm	9.5 mm
Height	164.1 mm	164 mm
Width	75.6 mm	76.4 mm
Frame	Aluminium	Aluminium
Back	Glass	Glass
Ingress protection	IP69	—
Water resistance (IPx)	IPx9	—
Glass protection	—	Corning Gorilla Glass 5
Colours	Titanium, White, Grey	Midnight, Platinum, Aurora
Display
Screen size	6.8″	6.8″
Panel	LTPO AMOLED	AMOLED
OLED panel	Yes	Yes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)	Yes	—
Resolution (width)	1,440 px	1,116 px
Resolution (height)	3,200 px	2,480 px
Pixel density	517 ppi	400 ppi
Refresh rate	120 Hz	120 Hz
Peak brightness	3,000 nits	1,300 nits
Measured brightness	1,801 nits	784 nits
Screen-to-body ratio	89.8%	89.1%
HDR	Yes	Yes
Performance
Chipset	Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3	Qualcomm SM8550-AC Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
Chip maker	Qualcomm	Qualcomm
Process	4 nm	4 nm
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	3.3 GHz	3.36 GHz
GPU	Adreno 750	Adreno 740
AnTuTu score	2,152,790	1,326,652
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	6,311	5,129
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	4,934	—
Memory
RAM	16 GB	16 GB
Storage (max)	1,024 GB	512 GB
Storage (base)	256 GB	128 GB
Storage type	UFS 4.0	UFS 4.0
Memory card slot	No	No
Camera
Main camera	50 MP	50 MP
Main camera aperture	f/1.8	f/1.9
Main sensor size	1/0.98"	1/1.57"
Rear cameras	2	2
Optical stabilisation	Yes	No
Ultra-wide camera	Yes	Yes
Telephoto camera	Yes	No
Optical zoom	3.7×	—
Max video	8K	8K
4K video frame rate	120 fps	60 fps
Selfie camera	50 MP	16 MP
4K selfie video	Yes	No
Battery
Battery capacity	5,500 mAh	6,000 mAh
Battery type	Si/C	Li-Po
Active use (test)	12.9 h	—
Wired charging	80 W	80 W
Charged in 30 min	65%	86%
Wireless charging	Yes	No
Wireless charging power	30 W	—
Reverse wireless charging	Yes	—
Connectivity
5G	Yes	Yes
eSIM	No	No
Dual SIM	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 7	Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth	5.4	5.3
NFC	Yes	Yes
USB	USB Type-C 3.2	USB Type-C 3.2 (China)
USB version	3.2	3.2
Video output	Yes	Yes
Satellite messaging	Yes	—
Infrared port	Yes	—
Dual-band GPS	Yes	Yes
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS
Features
Stereo speakers	Yes	Yes
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	Yes
Loudspeaker loudness	-26.2 LUFS	-24.3 LUFS
Fingerprint sensor	Under display, ultrasonic	Under display
Sensors	Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Software
OS at launch	Android 14	Android 13
Platform	Android	Android
Interface	OriginOS 5	Redmagic OS 8