- android.gs
- Compare
- X Fold3 vs Mix Flip
Vivo X Fold3 vs Xiaomi Mix Flip
What X Fold3 does better (10) and where Mix Flip wins (5) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
X Fold3Mix Flip
| X Fold3 | Mix Flip | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 160 mm | 167.5 mm | −7.5 mm |
| Width | 142.7 mm | 74 mm | +68.7 mm |
| Thickness | 4.7 mm | 7.6 mm | −2.9 mm |
| Weight | 219 g | 190 g | +29 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is X Fold3 better than Mix Flip?
- Battery capacity5,500 mAh vs 4,780 mAh+15%
- Wired charging80 W vs 67 W+19%
- Peak brightness4,500 nits vs 3,000 nits+50%
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · Mix Flip: No
- Screen size8″ vs 6.9″+17%
- Resolution (width)2,200 px vs 1,224 px+80%
- Thickness4.7 mm vs 7.6 mm+62%
- USB version3.2 vs 2+60%
- Rear cameras3 vs 2+50%
- Screen-to-body ratio90.5% vs 87.5%+3%
Why is Mix Flip better than X Fold3?
- 4K selfie videoNo · X Fold3: Yes
- Weight219 g vs 190 g+15%
- Pixel density413 ppi vs 460 ppi+11%
- CPU frequency3.2 GHz vs 3.3 GHz+3%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.7+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 219 g | 190 g |
| Thickness | 4.7 mm | 7.6 mm |
| Height | 160 mm | 167.5 mm |
| Width | 142.7 mm | 74 mm |
| Frame | — | Aluminium |
| Back | — | Glass |
| Colours | Black, White | Black, White, Purple |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 8″ | 6.9″ |
| Panel | Foldable LTPO AMOLED | Foldable LTPO AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 2,200 px | 1,224 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,480 px | 2,912 px |
| Pixel density | 413 ppi | 460 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 4,500 nits | 3,000 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 1,314 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.5% | 87.5% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Foldable | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 | Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3.2 GHz | 3.3 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 740 | Adreno 750 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 1,609,570 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 6,035 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 4,209 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage (max) | 1,024 GB | 1,024 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.7 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.49" | 1/1.55" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | Yes |
| Optical zoom | 2× | 2× |
| Max video | 8K | 8K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,500 mAh | 4,780 mAh |
| Battery type | Si/C | — |
| Active use (test) | — | 12 h |
| Wired charging | 80 W | 67 W |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2 Gen 2 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 3.2 | 2 |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -27.6 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Barometer | — | Yes |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| SAR (head) | — | 1 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | OriginOS 4 | HyperOS 3 |
