How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
Rankings
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
CompareRankings
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. X Fold2 vs Mix Fold 4

Vivo X Fold2 vs Xiaomi Mix Fold 4

What X Fold2 does better (3) and where Mix Fold 4 wins (15) — every spec side by side.

Vivo X Fold2
Vivo · 2023X Fold2
8.0Score
3 advantages≈ $1,450
vs
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4
Xiaomi · 2024Mix Fold 4
9.2Score
15 advantages≈ $1,250
Higher score
5.4Display8.6
6.0Performance8.1
6.8Camera9.6
8.9Battery9.1
6.8Features7.4
Dimensions

Size comparison

X Fold2Mix Fold 4
143.4 × 161.36143.3 × 159.44.6
X Fold2Mix Fold 4Difference
Height161.3 mm159.4 mm+1.9 mm
Width143.4 mm143.3 mm+0.1 mm
Thickness6 mm4.6 mm+1.4 mm
Weight279 g226 g+53 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is X Fold2 better than Mix Fold 4?

  1. Wired charging120 W vs 67 W+79%
  2. Measured brightness1,308 nits vs 1,110 nits+18%
  3. Charged in 30 min115% vs 93%+24%

Why is Mix Fold 4 better than X Fold2?

  1. AnTuTu score1,314,521 vs 1,991,672+52%
  2. Optical zoom2× vs 5×2.5×
  3. Storage (max)512 GB vs 1,024 GB2×
  4. Geekbench 6 (multi-core)4,769 vs 6,630+39%
  5. RAM12 GB vs 16 GB+33%
  6. Battery capacity4,800 mAh vs 5,100 mAh+6%
  7. Peak brightness1,800 nits vs 3,000 nits+67%
  8. Weight279 g vs 226 g+23%
  9. Pixel density360 ppi vs 418 ppi+16%
  10. CPU frequency3.2 GHz vs 3.3 GHz+3%
  11. USB version2 vs 3.2+60%
  12. Rear cameras3 vs 4+33%
Specifications

Side by side

Vivo X Fold2Vivo X Fold2≈ $1,4508.0
Xiaomi Mix Fold 4Xiaomi Mix Fold 4≈ $1,2509.2
Design
Weight279 g226 g
Thickness6 mm4.6 mm
Height161.3 mm159.4 mm
Width143.4 mm143.3 mm
Frame—Aluminium
Back—Glass
Ingress protection—IPX8
Water resistance (IPx)—IPx8
ColoursBlack, Blue, RedBlack, White, Blue
Display
Screen size8″8″
PanelFoldable LTPO4 AMOLEDFoldable LTPO AMOLED
OLED panelYesYes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)YesYes
Resolution (width)1,916 px2,224 px
Resolution (height)2,160 px2,488 px
Pixel density360 ppi418 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness1,800 nits3,000 nits
Measured brightness1,308 nits1,110 nits
Screen-to-body ratio89.3%89.4%
HDRYesYes
FoldableYesYes
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
Chip makerQualcommQualcomm
Process4 nm4 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency3.2 GHz3.3 GHz
GPUAdreno 740Adreno 750
AnTuTu score1,314,5211,991,672
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)4,7696,630
Memory
RAM12 GB16 GB
Storage (max)512 GB1,024 GB
Storage (base)256 GB256 GB
Storage typeUFS 4.0UFS 4.0
Memory card slotNoNo
Camera
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.8f/1.7
Main sensor size1/1.49"1/1.49"
Rear cameras34
Optical stabilisationYesYes
Ultra-wide cameraYesYes
Telephoto cameraYesYes
Optical zoom2×5×
Max video8K8K
4K video frame rate60 fps60 fps
Selfie camera16 MP16 MP
4K selfie videoNoNo
Battery
Battery capacity4,800 mAh5,100 mAh
Battery type—Li-Po
Wired charging120 W67 W
Charged in 30 min115%93%
Wireless chargingYesYes
Wireless charging power50 W50 W
Reverse wireless chargingYesYes
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMNoNo
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.35.4
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-C 2.0USB Type-C 3.2
USB version23.2
Video output—Yes
Satellite messaging—Yes
Infrared port—Yes
Dual-band GPSYesYes
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSSGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC
Features
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5 mm headphone jackNoNo
Loudspeaker loudness-25.8 LUFS—
Fingerprint sensor—Side
BarometerYesYes
SensorsDual screen fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometerFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer
Software
OS at launchAndroid 13Android 14
PlatformAndroidAndroid
InterfaceOriginOS 3HyperOS

Related comparisons

OPPO Find N3vsVivo X Fold2OPPO Find N3vsVivo X Fold27.88.0
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare