- android.gs
- Compare
- X Fold+ vs Mi Mix Fold
Vivo X Fold+ vs Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold
What X Fold+ does better (12) and where Mi Mix Fold wins (7) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.0Display3.1
9.6Camera7.2
8.5Battery8.2
4.7Features5.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
X Fold+Mi Mix Fold
| X Fold+ | Mi Mix Fold | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 162 mm | 173.3 mm | −11.3 mm |
| Width | 144.9 mm | 133.4 mm | +11.5 mm |
| Thickness | 6.3 mm | 7.6 mm | −1.3 mm |
| Weight | 311 g | 317 g | −6 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is X Fold+ better than Mi Mix Fold?
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 60 Hz2×
- Optical stabilisationYes · Mi Mix Fold: No
- Wireless chargingYes · Mi Mix Fold: No
- Optical zoom5× vs 3×+67%
- Wired charging80 W vs 67 W+19%
- Rear cameras4 vs 22×
- CPU frequency3.19 GHz vs 2.84 GHz+12%
- Process4 nm vs 5 nm+25%
- Thickness6.3 mm vs 7.6 mm+21%
- Charged in 30 min86% vs 81%+6%
- Resolution (width)1,916 px vs 1,860 px+3%
- Screen-to-body ratio88% vs 85.9%+2%
Why is Mi Mix Fold better than X Fold+?
- Main camera50 MP vs 108 MP2.2×
- RAM12 GB vs 16 GB+33%
- Battery capacity4,730 mAh vs 5,020 mAh+6%
- Dual SIMNo · X Fold+: Yes
- Pixel density360 ppi vs 387 ppi+7%
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 20 MP+25%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 6E+8%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 311 g | 317 g |
| Thickness | 6.3 mm | 7.6 mm |
| Height | 162 mm | 173.3 mm |
| Width | 144.9 mm | 133.4 mm |
| Frame | — | Aluminium |
| Back | — | Glass |
| Colours | Black, Blue, Red | Black, Ceramic |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 8″ | 8″ |
| Panel | Foldable LTPO AMOLED | Foldable AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | Yes | — |
| Resolution (width) | 1,916 px | 1,860 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,160 px | 2,480 px |
| Pixel density | 360 ppi | 387 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 900 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 88% | 85.9% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Foldable | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 4 nm | 5 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3.19 GHz | 2.84 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Adreno 660 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 108 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.57" | 1/1.52" |
| Rear cameras | 4 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | Yes |
| Optical zoom | 5× | 3× |
| Max video | 8K | 8K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 20 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,730 mAh | 5,020 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 80 W | 67 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 86% | 81% |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging power | 50 W | — |
| Reverse wireless charging | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | No | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2 | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.2 | — |
| Dual-band GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Barometer | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 12 | Android 10 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | OriginOS Ocean | MIUI 12 |
