- android.gs
- Compare
- V80 vs X200T
Vivo V80 vs Vivo X200T
What V80 does better (4) and where X200T wins (11) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
V80X200T
| V80 | X200T | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 157.5 mm | 160 mm | −2.5 mm |
| Width | 74.3 mm | 74.3 mm | = |
| Thickness | 7.7 mm | 8 mm | −0.3 mm |
| Weight | 203 g | 203 g | = |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is V80 better than X200T?
- Battery capacity7,200 mAh vs 6,200 mAh+16%
- Refresh rate144 Hz vs 120 Hz+20%
- Selfie camera50 MP vs 32 MP+56%
- Thickness7.7 mm vs 8 mm+4%
Why is X200T better than V80?
- AnTuTu score1,400,432 vs 2,725,989+95%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)3,542 vs 8,4302.4×
- RAM8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
- Wireless chargingNo · V80: Yes
- CPU frequency2.8 GHz vs 3.63 GHz+30%
- Major OS updates promised4 vs 5+25%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 4 vs Wi-Fi 7+75%
- Charged in 30 min50% vs 70%+40%
- Process4 nm vs 3 nm+33%
- Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.6+19%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 203 g | 203 g |
| Thickness | 7.7 mm | 8 mm |
| Height | 157.5 mm | 160 mm |
| Width | 74.3 mm | 74.3 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Back | Glass | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Schott Xensation Core | Schott Xensation Core |
| Colours | Starwish Purple, Sunrise Anthem, Horizon Blue (Wander Green), Stellar Black (Vast Gray) | Seaside Lilac, Stellar Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.6″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,260 px | 1,260 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,750 px | 2,800 px |
| Pixel density | 459 ppi | 460 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 5,000 nits | 5,000 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.7% | 90.4% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7750-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 | Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 4 nm | 3 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.8 GHz | 3.63 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 722 | Immortalis-G925 |
| AnTuTu score | 1,400,432 | 2,725,989 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 3,542 | 8,430 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.1 | UFS 4.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.6 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | 1/1.56" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | Yes |
| Optical zoom | 3× | 3× |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 50 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 7,200 mAh | 6,200 mAh |
| Battery type | Si/C | Si/C |
| Wired charging | 90 W | 90 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 50% | 70% |
| Wireless charging | No | Yes |
| Wireless charging power | — | 40 W |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 4 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Video output | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| Dual-band GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display, ultrasonic | Under display, ultrasonic |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, compass, proximity | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 1.09 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 17 | Android 16 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | OriginOS 7 | OriginOS 6 |
| Major OS updates promised | 4 | 5 |
