- android.gs
- Compare
- V40 Lite vs Poco C75 5G
Vivo V40 Lite vs Xiaomi Poco C75 5G
What V40 Lite does better (20) and where Poco C75 5G wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.1Display5.9
5.5Performance3.4
7.1Camera4.1
7.9Battery6.3
6.2Features4.2
Dimensions
Size comparison
V40 LitePoco C75 5G
| V40 Lite | Poco C75 5G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 164.4 mm | 171.9 mm | −7.5 mm |
| Width | 74.8 mm | 77.8 mm | −3 mm |
| Thickness | 7.7 mm | 8.2 mm | −0.5 mm |
| Weight | 179 g | 212 g | −33 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is V40 Lite better than Poco C75 5G?
- Wired charging44 W vs 18 W2.4×
- AnTuTu score697,953 vs 391,505+78%
- RAM8 GB vs 4 GB2×
- Peak brightness1,300 nits vs 600 nits2.2×
- OLED panelYes · Poco C75 5G: No
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- NFCYes · Poco C75 5G: No
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)2,801 vs 2,014+39%
- Battery capacity5,500 mAh vs 5,160 mAh+7%
- Pixel density388 ppi vs 260 ppi+49%
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 5 MP6.4×
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 64 GB2×
Why is Poco C75 5G better than V40 Lite?
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · V40 Lite: Yes
- Bluetooth5.1 vs 5.3+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 179 g | 212 g |
| Thickness | 7.7 mm | 8.2 mm |
| Height | 164.4 mm | 171.9 mm |
| Width | 74.8 mm | 77.8 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Glass | — |
| Ingress protection | IP64 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | — |
| Colours | Classy Brown, Dreamy White | Aqua Bliss, Enchanted Green, Silver Stardust |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.9″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 720 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 1,640 px |
| Pixel density | 388 ppi | 260 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,300 nits | 600 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.3% | 84% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6450 Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 | Qualcomm SM4635 Snapdragon 4s Gen 2 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 710 | Adreno 611 |
| AnTuTu score | 697,953 | 391,505 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,801 | 2,014 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 141 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | — |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.95" | — |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 1080p |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 5 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,500 mAh | 5,160 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 44 W | 18 W |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass |
| SAR (head) | 0.99 W/kg | 0.85 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Funtouch 14 | HyperOS |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 2 |
