- android.gs
- Compare
- V29 vs Axon 30S
Vivo V29 vs ZTE Axon 30S
What V29 does better (11) and where Axon 30S wins (8) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
V29Axon 30S
| V29 | Axon 30S | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 164.2 mm | 170.2 mm | −6 mm |
| Width | 74.4 mm | 77.8 mm | −3.4 mm |
| Thickness | 7.5 mm | 7.8 mm | −0.3 mm |
| Weight | 186 g | 189 g | −3 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is V29 better than Axon 30S?
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Optical stabilisationYes · Axon 30S: No
- Wired charging80 W vs 55 W+45%
- Battery capacity4,600 mAh vs 4,200 mAh+10%
- Selfie camera50 MP vs 16 MP3.1×
- eSIMYes · Axon 30S: No
- Pixel density453 ppi vs 400 ppi+13%
- Resolution (width)1,260 px vs 1,080 px+17%
- Process6 nm vs 7 nm+17%
- Screen-to-body ratio90.8% vs 80.8%+12%
- Thickness7.5 mm vs 7.8 mm+4%
Why is Axon 30S better than V29?
- Main camera50 MP vs 64 MP+28%
- CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 3.2 GHz+33%
- Memory card slotNo · V29: Yes
- 4K video frame rate30 fps vs 60 fps2×
- Screen size6.8″ vs 6.9″+2%
- USB version2 vs 3+50%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 6+20%
- Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.8+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 186 g | 189 g |
| Thickness | 7.5 mm | 7.8 mm |
| Height | 164.2 mm | 170.2 mm |
| Width | 74.4 mm | 77.8 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Glass | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass |
| Colours | Space Black, Himalayan Blue, Purple Fairy, Majestic Red | Black, Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.9″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,260 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,800 px | 2,460 px |
| Pixel density | 453 ppi | 400 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,300 nits | — |
| Measured brightness | 996 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.8% | 80.8% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 6 nm | 7 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 642L | Adreno 650 |
| AnTuTu score | 544,639 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,797 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | 1/1.73" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 50 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,600 mAh | 4,200 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Ion |
| Wired charging | 80 W | 55 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 88% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.1 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 3.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 3 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -28.7 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | 0.94 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 12 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Funtouch 13 | MyOS 12 |
| Major OS updates promised | 3 | — |
