- android.gs
- Compare
- V29 vs Redmi K40S
Vivo V29 vs Xiaomi Redmi K40S
What V29 does better (14) and where Redmi K40S wins (4) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.8Display7.9
8.5Camera8.0
6.3Battery5.5
7.8Features6.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
V29Redmi K40S
| V29 | Redmi K40S | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 164.2 mm | 163.2 mm | +1 mm |
| Width | 74.4 mm | 76 mm | −1.6 mm |
| Thickness | 7.5 mm | 7.7 mm | −0.2 mm |
| Weight | 186 g | 195 g | −9 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is V29 better than Redmi K40S?
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx32.7×
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Battery capacity4,600 mAh vs 4,500 mAh+2%
- Wired charging80 W vs 67 W+19%
- Selfie camera50 MP vs 20 MP2.5×
- Main camera50 MP vs 48 MP+4%
- eSIMYes · Redmi K40S: No
- Pixel density453 ppi vs 395 ppi+15%
- Weight186 g vs 195 g+5%
- Resolution (width)1,260 px vs 1,080 px+17%
- Process6 nm vs 7 nm+17%
- Charged in 30 min88% vs 79%+11%
Why is Redmi K40S better than V29?
- Stereo speakersNo · V29: Yes
- CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 3.2 GHz+33%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 6+20%
- Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.8+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 186 g | 195 g |
| Thickness | 7.5 mm | 7.7 mm |
| Height | 164.2 mm | 163.2 mm |
| Width | 74.4 mm | 76 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Glass | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP53 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx3 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Space Black, Himalayan Blue, Purple Fairy, Majestic Red | Black, Gray, Blue, Green |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,260 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,800 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 453 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,300 nits | 1,300 nits |
| Measured brightness | 996 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.8% | 86.6% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 6 nm | 7 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 642L | Adreno 650 |
| AnTuTu score | 544,639 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,797 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 48 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | 1/2.0" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 50 MP | 20 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,600 mAh | 4,500 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 80 W | 67 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 88% | 79% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Dual-band GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -28.7 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | 0.94 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 12 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Funtouch 13 | MIUI 13 |
| Major OS updates promised | 3 | — |
