- android.gs
- Compare
- V27e vs Redmi Note 12 Turbo
Vivo V27e vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Turbo
What V27e does better (5) and where Redmi Note 12 Turbo wins (19) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.3Display7.6
4.6Performance8.0
8.6Camera8.4
5.7Battery7.2
4.5Features7.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
V27eRedmi Note 12 Turbo
| V27e | Redmi Note 12 Turbo | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 162.5 mm | 161.1 mm | +1.4 mm |
| Width | 75.8 mm | 75 mm | +0.8 mm |
| Thickness | 7.7 mm | 7.9 mm | −0.2 mm |
| Weight | 185 g | 181 g | +4 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is V27e better than Redmi Note 12 Turbo?
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx3+33%
- Memory card slotYes · Redmi Note 12 Turbo: No
- 4K video frame rate60 fps vs 30 fps2×
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 16 MP2×
- Thickness7.7 mm vs 7.9 mm+3%
Why is Redmi Note 12 Turbo better than V27e?
- AnTuTu score581,988 vs 1,333,2992.3×
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)1,470 vs 4,5123.1×
- 3DMark Wild Life Extreme344 vs 1,9625.7×
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 1,024 GB4×
- Peak brightness500 nits vs 1,000 nits2×
- 5GNo · V27e: Yes
- Stereo speakersNo · V27e: Yes
- RAM12 GB vs 16 GB+33%
- Battery capacity4,600 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+9%
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 2.91 GHz+32%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Rear cameras1 vs 22×
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 185 g | 181 g |
| Thickness | 7.7 mm | 7.9 mm |
| Height | 162.5 mm | 161.1 mm |
| Width | 75.8 mm | 75 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP54 | IP53 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx3 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Glory Black, Lavender Purple, Lively Green | Black, Blue, White, Harry Potter Edition |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.6″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | OLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 398 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 500 nits | 1,000 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 961 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85.9% | 88.9% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 | Qualcomm SM7475-AB Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 6 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.91 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 725 |
| AnTuTu score | 581,988 | 1,333,299 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,470 | 4,512 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 344 | 1,962 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 1,024 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/2.0" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,600 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 66 W | 67 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 79% | 83% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Funtouch 13 | MIUI 14 |
