- android.gs
- Compare
- V25 vs Blade V40 Pro
Vivo V25 vs ZTE Blade V40 Pro
What V25 does better (18) and where Blade V40 Pro wins (5) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.3Display6.5
8.8Camera6.1
4.8Battery7.9
6.2Features2.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
V25Blade V40 Pro
| V25 | Blade V40 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 159.2 mm | 163.9 mm | −4.7 mm |
| Width | 74.2 mm | 76.2 mm | −2 mm |
| Thickness | 7.8 mm | 8.3 mm | −0.5 mm |
| Weight | 186 g | 190 g | −4 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is V25 better than Blade V40 Pro?
- RAM12 GB vs 6 GB2×
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 60 Hz+50%
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Optical stabilisationYes · Blade V40 Pro: No
- 5GYes · Blade V40 Pro: No
- NFCYes · Blade V40 Pro: No
- Selfie camera50 MP vs 16 MP3.1×
- Process6 nm vs 12 nm2×
- Memory card slotYes · Blade V40 Pro: No
- Rear cameras2 vs 12×
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · Blade V40 Pro: No
- Max video4K vs 1080p
Why is Blade V40 Pro better than V25?
- Wired charging44 W vs 65 W+48%
- Battery capacity4,500 mAh vs 5,100 mAh+13%
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · V25: Yes
- Screen size6.4″ vs 6.7″+4%
- Charged in 30 min61% vs 100%+64%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 186 g | 190 g |
| Thickness | 7.8 mm | 8.3 mm |
| Height | 159.2 mm | 163.9 mm |
| Width | 74.2 mm | 76.2 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | Glass | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP54 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | — |
| Colours | Elegant Black, Sunrise Gold, Surfing Blue | Dark Green, Iridescent White |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.4″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,404 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 409 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,300 nits | — |
| Measured brightness | 781 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.7% | 86% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 900 | Unisoc Tiger T618 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Unisoc |
| Process | 6 nm | 12 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 | Mali G52 MP2 |
| AnTuTu score | 461,428 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,023 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 6 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | — |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 1080p |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 50 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,500 mAh | 5,100 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 44 W | 65 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 61% | 100% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 4 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | — |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | — |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -28.3 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | 0.94 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 12 | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Funtouch 12 | MyOS 11 |
