- android.gs
- Compare
- V23 Pro vs Redmi K50
Vivo V23 Pro vs Xiaomi Redmi K50
What V23 Pro does better (7) and where Redmi K50 wins (12) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
V23 ProRedmi K50
| V23 Pro | Redmi K50 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 159.5 mm | 163.1 mm | −3.6 mm |
| Width | 73.3 mm | 76.2 mm | −2.9 mm |
| Thickness | 7.4 mm | 8.5 mm | −1.1 mm |
| Weight | 171 g | 201 g | −30 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is V23 Pro better than Redmi K50?
- Main camera108 MP vs 48 MP2.2×
- Selfie camera50 MP vs 20 MP2.5×
- 4K selfie videoYes · Redmi K50: No
- Weight171 g vs 201 g+18%
- CPU frequency3 GHz vs 2.85 GHz+5%
- Thickness7.4 mm vs 8.5 mm+15%
- Screen-to-body ratio89.5% vs 86.4%+4%
Why is Redmi K50 better than V23 Pro?
- Battery capacity4,300 mAh vs 5,500 mAh+28%
- Wired charging44 W vs 67 W+52%
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 512 GB2×
- Optical stabilisationNo · V23 Pro: Yes
- NFCNo · V23 Pro: Yes
- Stereo speakersNo · V23 Pro: Yes
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 120 Hz+33%
- Pixel density398 ppi vs 526 ppi+32%
- Resolution (width)1,080 px vs 1,440 px+33%
- Charged in 30 min63% vs 80%+27%
- Process6 nm vs 5 nm+20%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 6+20%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 171 g | 201 g |
| Thickness | 7.4 mm | 8.5 mm |
| Height | 159.5 mm | 163.1 mm |
| Width | 73.3 mm | 76.2 mm |
| Back | Glass | Glass |
| Ingress protection | — | IP53 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx3 |
| Glass protection | Schott Xensation α glass | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Colours | Sunshine Gold, Stardust Black | Black, Gray, Blue, Green |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.6″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | OLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,440 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,376 px | 3,200 px |
| Pixel density | 398 ppi | 526 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 1,200 nits |
| Measured brightness | 798 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.5% | 86.4% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1200 | Mediatek Dimensity 8100 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 5 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3 GHz | 2.85 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 | Mali-G610 |
| AnTuTu score | 635,060 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 12,377 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 108 MP | 48 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | — |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.52" | 1/2.0" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 50 MP | 20 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,300 mAh | 5,500 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 44 W | 67 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 63% | 80% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.3 |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | — | 2 |
| Dual-band GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -28.6 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | 1.22 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 12 | Android 12 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Funtouch 12 | MIUI 13 |
