- android.gs
- Compare
- iQOO Z9s Pro vs Poco F5
Vivo iQOO Z9s Pro vs Xiaomi Poco F5
What iQOO Z9s Pro does better (7) and where Poco F5 wins (7) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.7Display7.6
7.1Performance7.3
8.1Camera8.4
8.5Battery5.4
4.7Features6.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
iQOO Z9s ProPoco F5
| iQOO Z9s Pro | Poco F5 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 163.7 mm | 161.1 mm | +2.6 mm |
| Width | 75 mm | 75 mm | = |
| Thickness | 7.5 mm | 7.9 mm | −0.4 mm |
| Weight | 185 g | 181 g | +4 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is iQOO Z9s Pro better than Poco F5?
- Peak brightness4,500 nits vs 1,000 nits4.5×
- Battery capacity5,500 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+10%
- AnTuTu score1,015,447 vs 931,174+9%
- Wired charging80 W vs 67 W+19%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx3+33%
- Charged in 30 min71% vs 65%+9%
- Thickness7.5 mm vs 7.9 mm+5%
Why is Poco F5 better than iQOO Z9s Pro?
- NFCNo · iQOO Z9s Pro: Yes
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)3,036 vs 3,939+30%
- Main camera50 MP vs 64 MP+28%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · iQOO Z9s Pro: Yes
- CPU frequency2.63 GHz vs 2.91 GHz+11%
- Weight185 g vs 181 g+2%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 185 g | 181 g |
| Thickness | 7.5 mm | 7.9 mm |
| Height | 163.7 mm | 161.1 mm |
| Width | 75 mm | 75 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP64 | IP53 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx3 |
| Glass protection | Schott Xensation | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Flamboyant Orange, Luxe Marble | Black, Blue, White |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,392 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 388 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 4,500 nits | 1,000 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 963 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.3% | 88.9% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7550-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 | Qualcomm SM7475-AB Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.63 GHz | 2.91 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 720 | Adreno 725 |
| AnTuTu score | 1,015,447 | 931,174 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 3,036 | 3,939 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 1,956 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.95" | 1/2.0" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,500 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Po |
| Active use (test) | — | 11.9 h |
| Wired charging | 80 W | 67 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 71% | 65% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.3 |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -24.3 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.99 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Funtouch 14 | HyperOS |
| Major OS updates promised | 2 | — |
