- android.gs
- Compare
- iQOO Z9 Turbo Endurance vs Redmi Turbo 4 Pro
Vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo Endurance vs Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 Pro
What iQOO Z9 Turbo Endurance does better (4) and where Redmi Turbo 4 Pro wins (10) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.7Display9.4
8.4Performance8.8
8.6Camera8.8
9.1Battery9.5
7.5Features9.3
Dimensions
Size comparison
iQOO Z9 Turbo EnduranceRedmi Turbo 4 Pro
| iQOO Z9 Turbo Endurance | Redmi Turbo 4 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 163.7 mm | 163.1 mm | +0.6 mm |
| Width | 75.9 mm | 77.9 mm | −2 mm |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 8 mm | = |
| Weight | 196 g | 219 g | −23 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is iQOO Z9 Turbo Endurance better than Redmi Turbo 4 Pro?
- Refresh rate144 Hz vs 120 Hz+20%
- Peak brightness4,500 nits vs 3,200 nits+41%
- Weight196 g vs 219 g+12%
- Charged in 30 min100% vs 56%+79%
Why is Redmi Turbo 4 Pro better than iQOO Z9 Turbo Endurance?
- AnTuTu score1,821,945 vs 2,292,541+26%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx82×
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 1,024 GB2×
- Battery capacity6,400 mAh vs 7,550 mAh+18%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)5,074 vs 7,029+39%
- Wired charging80 W vs 90 W+12%
- CPU frequency3 GHz vs 3.21 GHz+7%
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 20 MP+25%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.5+20%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 7+17%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 196 g | 219 g |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 8 mm |
| Height | 163.7 mm | 163.1 mm |
| Width | 75.9 mm | 77.9 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Aluminium |
| Back | Plastic | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP64 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx8 |
| Colours | Black, White, Blue | Black, White, Green, Harry Potter edition |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,260 px | 1,280 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,800 px | 2,772 px |
| Pixel density | 453 ppi | 447 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 4,500 nits | 3,200 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.3% | 90.2% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 | Qualcomm SM8735 Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3 GHz | 3.21 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 735 | Adreno 825 |
| AnTuTu score | 1,821,945 | 2,292,541 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 5,074 | 7,029 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 3,705 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 1,024 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 4.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.5 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.95" | 1/1.95" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 20 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,400 mAh | 7,550 mAh |
| Battery type | Si/C | Si/C |
| Wired charging | 80 W | 90 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 100% | 56% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | OriginOS 4 | HyperOS 2 |
