How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. iQOO Z7 (China) vs Redmi Note 12 Pro+

Vivo iQOO Z7 (China) vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+

What iQOO Z7 (China) does better (2) and where Redmi Note 12 Pro+ wins (7) — every spec side by side.

Vivo iQOO Z7 (China)
Vivo · 2023iQOO Z7 (China)
8.1Score
2 advantages≈ $240
Higher score
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+
Xiaomi · 2022Redmi Note 12 Pro+
7.6Score
7 advantages≈ $210
6.6Display7.5
7.9Camera8.6
7.8Battery5.3
7.9Features6.9
Dimensions

Size comparison

iQOO Z7 (China)Redmi Note 12 Pro+
75.8 × 164.68.876 × 162.98.9
iQOO Z7 (China)Redmi Note 12 Pro+Difference
Height164.6 mm162.9 mm+1.7 mm
Width75.8 mm76 mm−0.2 mm
Thickness8.8 mm8.9 mm−0.1 mm
Weight202 g208 g−7 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is iQOO Z7 (China) better than Redmi Note 12 Pro+?

  1. CPU frequency2.7 GHz vs 2.6 GHz+4%
  2. Weight202 g vs 208 g+3%

Why is Redmi Note 12 Pro+ better than iQOO Z7 (China)?

  1. Main camera64 MP vs 200 MP3.1×
  2. OLED panelNo · iQOO Z7 (China): Yes
  3. Stereo speakersNo · iQOO Z7 (China): Yes
  4. Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
  5. Rear cameras1 vs 22×
  6. Ultra-wide cameraNo · iQOO Z7 (China): Yes
  7. Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.7+6%
Specifications

Side by side

Design
Weight202 g208 g
Thickness8.8 mm8.9 mm
Height164.6 mm162.9 mm
Width75.8 mm76 mm
Frame—Plastic
Back—Glass
Ingress protection—IP53
Water resistance (IPx)—IPx3
Glass protection—Corning Gorilla Glass 5
ColoursBlack, Blue, OrangeArctic White, Iceberg Blue, Obsidian Black, Trend edition
Display
Screen size6.6″6.7″
PanelIPS LCDOLED
OLED panelNoYes
Resolution (width)1,080 px1,080 px
Resolution (height)2,388 px2,400 px
Pixel density395 ppi395 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness—900 nits
Measured brightness—990 nits
Screen-to-body ratio85.6%86.8%
HDRYesYes
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 782GMediatek Dimensity 1080
Chip makerQualcommMediaTek
Process6 nm6 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency2.7 GHz2.6 GHz
GPUAdreno 642LMali-G68 MC4
AnTuTu score—498,710
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)—2,208
3DMark Wild Life Extreme—629
Memory
RAM12 GB12 GB
Storage (max)256 GB256 GB
Storage (base)128 GB256 GB
Storage typeUFS 2.2UFS 2.2
Memory card slotNoNo
Camera
Main camera64 MP200 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.8f/1.7
Main sensor size1/1.97"1/1.4"
Rear cameras12
Optical stabilisationYesYes
Ultra-wide cameraNoYes
Telephoto cameraNoNo
Max video4K4K
4K video frame rate30 fps30 fps
Selfie camera16 MP16 MP
4K selfie videoNoNo
Battery
Battery capacity5,000 mAh5,000 mAh
Battery type—Li-Po
Active use (test)—10.6 h
Wired charging120 W120 W
Charged in 30 min—158%
Wireless chargingNoNo
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMNoNo
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6Wi-Fi 6
Bluetooth5.25.2
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-C 2.0USB Type-C 2.0
USB version22
Infrared port—Yes
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDSGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS
Features
Stereo speakersNoYes
3.5 mm headphone jackYesYes
Loudspeaker loudness—-26.7 LUFS
Fingerprint sensorSideSide
SensorsFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass
SAR (head)—1 W/kg
Software
OS at launchAndroid 13Android 12
PlatformAndroidAndroid
InterfaceOriginOS 3HyperOS
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare