How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. iQOO Z11x vs Poco M8 Pro

Vivo iQOO Z11x vs Xiaomi Poco M8 Pro

What iQOO Z11x does better (3) and where Poco M8 Pro wins (15) — every spec side by side.

Vivo iQOO Z11x
Vivo · 2026iQOO Z11x
8.2Score
3 advantages≈ $340
vs
Xiaomi Poco M8 Pro
Xiaomi · 2026Poco M8 Pro
9.0Score
15 advantages≈ $320
Higher score
7.1Display9.4
6.4Camera7.9
8.7Battery9.1
8.4Features8.8
Dimensions

Size comparison

iQOO Z11xPoco M8 Pro
78.4 × 166.68.478.3 × 163.38.3
iQOO Z11xPoco M8 ProDifference
Height166.6 mm163.3 mm+3.3 mm
Width78.4 mm78.3 mm+0.1 mm
Thickness8.4 mm8.3 mm+0.1 mm
Weight219 g206 g+13 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is iQOO Z11x better than Poco M8 Pro?

  1. Battery capacity7,200 mAh vs 6,500 mAh+11%
  2. Max video4K vs 1080p
  3. 4K selfie videoYes · Poco M8 Pro: No

Why is Poco M8 Pro better than iQOO Z11x?

  1. Wired charging44 W vs 100 W2.3×
  2. Peak brightness1,200 nits vs 3,200 nits2.7×
  3. OLED panelNo · iQOO Z11x: Yes
  4. Optical stabilisationNo · iQOO Z11x: Yes
  5. Charged in 30 min35% vs 75%2.1×
  6. Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
  7. Rear cameras1 vs 22×
  8. Ultra-wide cameraNo · iQOO Z11x: Yes
  9. Pixel density382 ppi vs 447 ppi+17%
  10. Weight219 g vs 206 g+6%
  11. CPU frequency2.6 GHz vs 2.7 GHz+4%
  12. Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 6E+30%
Specifications

Side by side

Vivo iQOO Z11xVivo iQOO Z11x≈ $3408.2
Design
Weight219 g206 g
Thickness8.4 mm8.3 mm
Height166.6 mm163.3 mm
Width78.4 mm78.3 mm
FramePlasticPlastic
BackPlasticPlastic
Ingress protectionIP68IP68
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8IPx8
Glass protection—Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2
ColoursPrismatic Green, Titan Black, Star SilverBlack, Green, Silver
Display
Screen size6.8″6.8″
PanelIPS LCDAMOLED
OLED panelNoYes
Resolution (width)1,080 px1,280 px
Resolution (height)2,344 px2,772 px
Pixel density382 ppi447 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness1,200 nits3,200 nits
Measured brightness—1,435 nits
Screen-to-body ratio85.8%89.6%
HDR—Yes
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 7400 TurboQualcomm SM7635-AC Snapdragon 7s Gen 4
Chip makerMediaTekQualcomm
Process4 nm4 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency2.6 GHz2.7 GHz
GPUMali-G615 MC2Adreno 810
AnTuTu score—817,222
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)—3,245
3DMark Wild Life Extreme—1,110
Memory
RAM12 GB12 GB
Storage (max)512 GB512 GB
Storage (base)128 GB256 GB
Storage typeUFS 3.1UFS 2.2
Memory card slotNoNo
Camera
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.8f/1.6
Main sensor size1/2.93"1/1.55"
Rear cameras12
Optical stabilisationNoYes
Ultra-wide cameraNoYes
Telephoto cameraNoNo
Max video4K1080p
4K video frame rate30 fps30 fps
Selfie camera32 MP32 MP
4K selfie videoYesNo
Battery
Battery capacity7,200 mAh6,500 mAh
Battery typeSi/CSi/C
Active use (test)—16.2 h
Wired charging44 W100 W
Charged in 30 min35%75%
Wireless chargingNoNo
Reverse wireless charging—Yes
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMNoNo
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5Wi-Fi 6E
Bluetooth5.45.4
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-C 2.0USB Type-C 2.0
USB version22
Infrared port—Yes
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSSGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS
Features
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5 mm headphone jackNoNo
Loudspeaker loudness—-19.5 LUFS
Fingerprint sensorSideUnder display
SensorsFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, proximity
Software
OS at launchAndroid 16Android 15
PlatformAndroidAndroid
InterfaceOriginOS 6HyperOS 2
Major OS updates promised—4
EU label
Energy class—B
Battery charge cycles—1,000
Endurance per cycle—61 h
Repairability class—C
Drop resistance class—A
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare