How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. iQOO Z11 Turbo vs Poco M8 Pro

Vivo iQOO Z11 Turbo vs Xiaomi Poco M8 Pro

What iQOO Z11 Turbo does better (16) and where Poco M8 Pro wins (4) — every spec side by side.

Vivo iQOO Z11 Turbo
Vivo · 2026iQOO Z11 Turbo
9.6Score
16 advantages≈ $320
Higher score
vs
Xiaomi Poco M8 Pro
Xiaomi · 2026Poco M8 Pro
9.0Score
4 advantages≈ $320
9.6Display9.4
9.4Performance6.8
9.2Camera7.9
9.6Battery9.1
9.3Features8.8
Dimensions

Size comparison

iQOO Z11 TurboPoco M8 Pro
74.4 × 157.67.978.3 × 163.38.3
iQOO Z11 TurboPoco M8 ProDifference
Height157.6 mm163.3 mm−5.7 mm
Width74.4 mm78.3 mm−3.9 mm
Thickness7.9 mm8.3 mm−0.4 mm
Weight202 g206 g−4 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is iQOO Z11 Turbo better than Poco M8 Pro?

  1. AnTuTu score3,068,959 vs 817,2223.8×
  2. Geekbench 6 (multi-core)9,106 vs 3,2452.8×
  3. Main camera200 MP vs 50 MP4×
  4. Storage (max)1,024 GB vs 512 GB2×
  5. Battery capacity7,600 mAh vs 6,500 mAh+17%
  6. RAM16 GB vs 12 GB+33%
  7. Peak brightness5,500 nits vs 3,200 nits+72%
  8. Refresh rate144 Hz vs 120 Hz+20%
  9. CPU frequency3.8 GHz vs 2.7 GHz+41%
  10. Max video4K vs 1080p
  11. 4K video frame rate60 fps vs 30 fps2×
  12. 4K selfie videoYes · Poco M8 Pro: No

Why is Poco M8 Pro better than iQOO Z11 Turbo?

  1. Screen size6.6″ vs 6.8″+4%
  2. Charged in 30 min56% vs 75%+34%
  3. Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.6+19%
  4. Screen-to-body ratio87.8% vs 89.6%+2%
Specifications

Side by side

Design
Weight202 g206 g
Thickness7.9 mm8.3 mm
Height157.6 mm163.3 mm
Width74.4 mm78.3 mm
FrameAluminiumPlastic
BackGlassPlastic
Ingress protectionIP68IP68
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8IPx8
Glass protection—Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2
ColoursWhite, Black, Blue, PinkBlack, Green, Silver
Display
Screen size6.6″6.8″
PanelAMOLEDAMOLED
OLED panelYesYes
Resolution (width)1,260 px1,280 px
Resolution (height)2,750 px2,772 px
Pixel density466 ppi447 ppi
Refresh rate144 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness5,500 nits3,200 nits
Measured brightness—1,435 nits
Screen-to-body ratio87.8%89.6%
HDRYesYes
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm SM8845 Snapdragon 8 Gen 5Qualcomm SM7635-AC Snapdragon 7s Gen 4
Chip makerQualcommQualcomm
Process3 nm4 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency3.8 GHz2.7 GHz
GPUAdreno 829Adreno 810
AnTuTu score3,068,959817,222
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)9,1063,245
3DMark Wild Life Extreme—1,110
Memory
RAM16 GB12 GB
Storage (max)1,024 GB512 GB
Storage (base)256 GB256 GB
Storage typeUFS 4.1UFS 2.2
Memory card slotNoNo
Camera
Main camera200 MP50 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.9f/1.6
Main sensor size1/1.56"1/1.55"
Rear cameras22
Optical stabilisationYesYes
Ultra-wide cameraYesYes
Telephoto cameraNoNo
Max video4K1080p
4K video frame rate60 fps30 fps
Selfie camera32 MP32 MP
4K selfie videoYesNo
Battery
Battery capacity7,600 mAh6,500 mAh
Battery typeSi/CSi/C
Active use (test)—16.2 h
Wired charging100 W100 W
Charged in 30 min56%75%
Wireless chargingNoNo
Reverse wireless charging—Yes
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMNoNo
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 6E
Bluetooth5.45.4
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-C 2.0USB Type-C 2.0
USB version22
Infrared portYesYes
Dual-band GPSYes—
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSSGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS
Features
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5 mm headphone jackNoNo
Loudspeaker loudness—-19.5 LUFS
Fingerprint sensorUnder display, ultrasonicUnder display
SensorsFingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, proximity
Software
OS at launchAndroid 16Android 15
PlatformAndroidAndroid
InterfaceOriginOS 6HyperOS 2
Major OS updates promised—4
EU label
Energy class—B
Battery charge cycles—1,000
Endurance per cycle—61 h
Repairability class—C
Drop resistance class—A
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare