- android.gs
- Compare
- iQOO Z10 Lite vs Redmi 15
Vivo iQOO Z10 Lite vs Xiaomi Redmi 15
What iQOO Z10 Lite does better (8) and where Redmi 15 wins (10) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.4Display7.4
4.0Performance4.2
4.1Camera4.6
6.6Battery8.3
4.4Features6.2
Dimensions
Size comparison
iQOO Z10 LiteRedmi 15
| iQOO Z10 Lite | Redmi 15 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 167.3 mm | 169.5 mm | −2.2 mm |
| Width | 77 mm | 80.5 mm | −3.5 mm |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 8.4 mm | −0.2 mm |
| Weight | 202 g | 217 g | −15 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is iQOO Z10 Lite better than Redmi 15?
- Stereo speakersYes · Redmi 15: No
- AnTuTu score501,473 vs 459,712+9%
- 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · Redmi 15: No
- Peak brightness1,000 nits vs 850 nits+18%
- Weight202 g vs 217 g+7%
- CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 2.3 GHz+4%
- Bluetooth5.4 vs 5.1+6%
- Thickness8.2 mm vs 8.4 mm+2%
Why is Redmi 15 better than iQOO Z10 Lite?
- Wired charging15 W vs 33 W2.2×
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 144 Hz+60%
- NFCNo · iQOO Z10 Lite: Yes
- Battery capacity6,000 mAh vs 7,000 mAh+17%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)1,775 vs 2,179+23%
- Pixel density260 ppi vs 374 ppi+44%
- Storage (base)64 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Screen size6.7″ vs 6.9″+2%
- Selfie camera5 MP vs 8 MP+60%
- Resolution (width)720 px vs 1,080 px+50%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 202 g | 217 g |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 8.4 mm |
| Height | 167.3 mm | 169.5 mm |
| Width | 77 mm | 80.5 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP64 | IP64 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx4 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Colours | Titanium Blue, Cyber Green | Midnight Black, Titan Gray, Ripple Green |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.9″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 720 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 1,600 px | 2,340 px |
| Pixel density | 260 ppi | 374 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,000 nits | 850 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85.1% | 85.7% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6300 | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 6s Gen 3 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2.3 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 619 |
| AnTuTu score | 501,473 | 459,712 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,775 | 2,179 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 421 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 64 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/2.88" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 5 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,000 mAh | 7,000 mAh |
| Wired charging | 15 W | 33 W |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.1 |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 1 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Funtouch 15 | HyperOS 3 |
| Major OS updates promised | 2 | — |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | — | B |
| Battery charge cycles | — | 1,000 |
| Endurance per cycle | — | 67 h |
| Repairability class | — | C |
| Drop resistance class | — | D |
