- android.gs
- Compare
- iQOO Neo9S Pro vs Redmi K80
Vivo iQOO Neo9S Pro vs Xiaomi Redmi K80
What iQOO Neo9S Pro does better (7) and where Redmi K80 wins (7) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.2Display9.1
9.0Performance8.8
8.9Camera9.0
8.6Battery9.3
7.7Features9.3
Dimensions
Size comparison
iQOO Neo9S ProRedmi K80
| iQOO Neo9S Pro | Redmi K80 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 163.5 mm | 160.3 mm | +3.2 mm |
| Width | 75.7 mm | 75 mm | +0.7 mm |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 8.1 mm | −0.1 mm |
| Weight | 190 g | 206 g | −16 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is iQOO Neo9S Pro better than Redmi K80?
- Wired charging120 W vs 90 W+33%
- AnTuTu score2,439,634 vs 2,277,927+7%
- Refresh rate144 Hz vs 120 Hz+20%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)7,578 vs 6,524+16%
- 3DMark Wild Life Extreme5,141 vs 4,262+21%
- Weight190 g vs 206 g+8%
- CPU frequency3.4 GHz vs 3.3 GHz+3%
Why is Redmi K80 better than iQOO Neo9S Pro?
- Peak brightness1,400 nits vs 3,200 nits2.3×
- Battery capacity5,160 mAh vs 6,550 mAh+27%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx82×
- Pixel density453 ppi vs 526 ppi+16%
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 20 MP+25%
- Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.6+19%
- Resolution (width)1,260 px vs 1,440 px+14%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 190 g | 206 g |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 8.1 mm |
| Height | 163.5 mm | 160.3 mm |
| Width | 75.7 mm | 75 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Glass | — |
| Ingress protection | IP54 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i |
| Colours | Black, White, Red | Black, White, Mint, Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | LTPO AMOLED | OLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | Yes | — |
| Resolution (width) | 1,260 px | 1,440 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,800 px | 3,200 px |
| Pixel density | 453 ppi | 526 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,400 nits | 3,200 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.7% | 89.3% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9300+ | Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3.4 GHz | 3.3 GHz |
| GPU | Immortalis-G720 MC12 | Adreno 750 |
| AnTuTu score | 2,439,634 | 2,277,927 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 7,578 | 6,524 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 5,141 | 4,262 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage (max) | 1,024 GB | 1,024 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.6 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.49" | 1/1.55" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 8K | 8K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 20 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,160 mAh | 6,550 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Si/C |
| Wired charging | 120 W | 90 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 133% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | — |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display, ultrasonic |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | OriginOS 4 | HyperOS 2 |
