How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. iQOO Neo9S Pro+ vs Poco F6

Vivo iQOO Neo9S Pro+ vs Xiaomi Poco F6

What iQOO Neo9S Pro+ does better (13) and where Poco F6 wins (4) — every spec side by side.

Vivo iQOO Neo9S Pro+
Vivo · 2024iQOO Neo9S Pro+
9.3Score
13 advantages≈ $410
Higher score
vs
Xiaomi Poco F6
Xiaomi · 2024Poco F6
8.6Score
4 advantages≈ $410
9.2Display8.8
8.8Performance8.0
8.9Camera8.8
9.0Battery4.9
7.7Features6.9
Dimensions

Size comparison

iQOO Neo9S Pro+Poco F6
75.7 × 163.5874.5 × 160.58
iQOO Neo9S Pro+Poco F6Difference
Height163.5 mm160.5 mm+3 mm
Width75.7 mm74.5 mm+1.2 mm
Thickness8 mm8 mm=
Weight193 g179 g+14 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is iQOO Neo9S Pro+ better than Poco F6?

  1. AnTuTu score2,342,433 vs 1,497,886+56%
  2. Storage (max)1,024 GB vs 512 GB2×
  3. Battery capacity5,500 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+10%
  4. RAM16 GB vs 12 GB+33%
  5. Wired charging120 W vs 90 W+33%
  6. Geekbench 6 (multi-core)6,334 vs 4,883+30%
  7. Refresh rate144 Hz vs 120 Hz+20%
  8. 3DMark Wild Life Extreme4,939 vs 3,110+59%
  9. Max video8K vs 4K
  10. CPU frequency3.3 GHz vs 3 GHz+10%
  11. Charged in 30 min124% vs 86%+44%
  12. Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7 vs Wi-Fi 6+17%

Why is Poco F6 better than iQOO Neo9S Pro+?

  1. Peak brightness1,400 nits vs 2,400 nits+71%
  2. Weight193 g vs 179 g+8%
  3. Selfie camera16 MP vs 20 MP+25%
  4. Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.6+19%
Specifications

Side by side

Xiaomi Poco F6Xiaomi Poco F6≈ $4108.6
Design
Weight193 g179 g
Thickness8 mm8 mm
Height163.5 mm160.5 mm
Width75.7 mm74.5 mm
FramePlasticPlastic
BackGlassPlastic
Ingress protectionIP64IP64
Water resistance (IPx)IPx4IPx4
Glass protection—Corning Gorilla Glass Victus
ColoursBlue/White, Black, WhiteBlack, Green, Titanium
Display
Screen size6.8″6.7″
PanelLTPO AMOLEDAMOLED
OLED panelYesYes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)Yes—
Resolution (width)1,260 px1,220 px
Resolution (height)2,800 px2,712 px
Pixel density453 ppi446 ppi
Refresh rate144 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness1,400 nits2,400 nits
Measured brightness—1,218 nits
Screen-to-body ratio89.7%89.8%
HDRYesYes
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3Qualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
Chip makerQualcommQualcomm
Process4 nm4 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency3.3 GHz3 GHz
GPUAdreno 750Adreno 735
AnTuTu score2,342,4331,497,886
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)6,3344,883
3DMark Wild Life Extreme4,9393,110
Memory
RAM16 GB12 GB
Storage (max)1,024 GB512 GB
Storage (base)256 GB256 GB
Storage typeUFS 4.0UFS 4.0
Memory card slotNoNo
Camera
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.9f/1.6
Main sensor size1/1.56"1/1.95"
Rear cameras22
Optical stabilisationYesYes
Ultra-wide cameraYesYes
Telephoto cameraNoNo
Max video8K4K
4K video frame rate60 fps60 fps
Selfie camera16 MP20 MP
4K selfie videoNoNo
Battery
Battery capacity5,500 mAh5,000 mAh
Battery typeSi/CLi-Po
Active use (test)—10.6 h
Wired charging120 W90 W
Charged in 30 min124%86%
Wireless chargingNoNo
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMNoNo
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 6
Bluetooth5.45.4
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-C 2.0USB Type-C 2.0
USB version22
Infrared portYesYes
Dual-band GPSYes—
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSSGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS
Features
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5 mm headphone jackNoNo
Loudspeaker loudness—-25.2 LUFS
Fingerprint sensorUnder display, ultrasonicUnder display
SensorsFingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass
SAR (head)—0.99 W/kg
Software
OS at launchAndroid 14Android 14
PlatformAndroidAndroid
InterfaceOriginOS 6HyperOS
Major OS updates promised—3
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare