How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. iQOO Neo9S Pro+ vs 13T Pro

Vivo iQOO Neo9S Pro+ vs Xiaomi 13T Pro

What iQOO Neo9S Pro+ does better (7) and where 13T Pro wins (7) — every spec side by side.

Vivo iQOO Neo9S Pro+
Vivo · 2024iQOO Neo9S Pro+
9.3Score
7 advantages≈ $410
Higher score
vs
Xiaomi 13T Pro
Xiaomi · 202313T Pro
9.0Score
7 advantages≈ $400
9.2Display9.4
8.8Performance8.1
8.9Camera8.9
9.0Battery5.8
7.7Features9.5
Dimensions

Size comparison

iQOO Neo9S Pro+13T Pro
75.7 × 163.5875.7 × 162.28.5
iQOO Neo9S Pro+13T ProDifference
Height163.5 mm162.2 mm+1.3 mm
Width75.7 mm75.7 mm=
Thickness8 mm8.5 mm−0.5 mm
Weight193 g200 g−7 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is iQOO Neo9S Pro+ better than 13T Pro?

  1. AnTuTu score2,342,433 vs 1,214,085+93%
  2. Battery capacity5,500 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+10%
  3. Geekbench 6 (multi-core)6,334 vs 4,859+30%
  4. Weight193 g vs 200 g+4%
  5. Thickness8 mm vs 8.5 mm+6%
  6. Resolution (width)1,260 px vs 1,220 px+3%
  7. Screen-to-body ratio89.7% vs 87.5%+3%

Why is 13T Pro better than iQOO Neo9S Pro+?

  1. Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx82×
  2. Telephoto cameraNo · iQOO Neo9S Pro+: Yes
  3. Peak brightness1,400 nits vs 2,600 nits+86%
  4. eSIMNo · iQOO Neo9S Pro+: Yes
  5. Rear cameras2 vs 3+50%
  6. Charged in 30 min124% vs 158%+27%
  7. Selfie camera16 MP vs 20 MP+25%
Specifications

Side by side

Xiaomi 13T ProXiaomi 13T Pro≈ $4009.0
Design
Weight193 g200 g
Thickness8 mm8.5 mm
Height163.5 mm162.2 mm
Width75.7 mm75.7 mm
FramePlasticPlastic
BackGlassGlass
Ingress protectionIP64IP68
Water resistance (IPx)IPx4IPx8
Glass protection—Corning Gorilla Glass 5
ColoursBlue/White, Black, WhiteAlpine Blue, Meadow Green, Black
Display
Screen size6.8″6.7″
PanelLTPO AMOLEDAMOLED
OLED panelYesYes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)Yes—
Resolution (width)1,260 px1,220 px
Resolution (height)2,800 px2,712 px
Pixel density453 ppi446 ppi
Refresh rate144 Hz144 Hz
Peak brightness1,400 nits2,600 nits
Measured brightness—1,094 nits
Screen-to-body ratio89.7%87.5%
HDRYesYes
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3Mediatek Dimensity 9200+
Chip makerQualcommMediaTek
Process4 nm4 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency3.3 GHz3.35 GHz
GPUAdreno 750Immortalis-G715 MC11
AnTuTu score2,342,4331,214,085
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)6,3344,859
3DMark Wild Life Extreme4,939—
Memory
RAM16 GB16 GB
Storage (max)1,024 GB1,024 GB
Storage (base)256 GB256 GB
Storage typeUFS 4.0UFS 4.0
Memory card slotNoNo
Camera
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.9f/1.9
Main sensor size1/1.56"1/1.28"
Rear cameras23
Optical stabilisationYesYes
Ultra-wide cameraYesYes
Telephoto cameraNoYes
Optical zoom—2×
Max video8K8K
4K video frame rate60 fps60 fps
Selfie camera16 MP20 MP
4K selfie videoNoNo
Battery
Battery capacity5,500 mAh5,000 mAh
Battery typeSi/CLi-Po
Active use (test)—11.8 h
Wired charging120 W120 W
Charged in 30 min124%158%
Wireless chargingNoNo
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMNoYes
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.45.4
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-C 2.0USB Type-C 2.0
USB version22
Infrared portYesYes
Dual-band GPSYesYes
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSSGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, NavIC
Features
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5 mm headphone jackNoNo
Loudspeaker loudness—-26.7 LUFS
Fingerprint sensorUnder display, ultrasonicUnder display
SensorsFingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
SAR (head)—1 W/kg
Software
OS at launchAndroid 14Android 13
PlatformAndroidAndroid
InterfaceOriginOS 6HyperOS
Major OS updates promised—4
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare