How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. iQOO Neo9S Pro+ vs 13 Ultra

Vivo iQOO Neo9S Pro+ vs Xiaomi 13 Ultra

What iQOO Neo9S Pro+ does better (10) and where 13 Ultra wins (9) — every spec side by side.

Vivo iQOO Neo9S Pro+
Vivo · 2024iQOO Neo9S Pro+
9.3Score
10 advantages≈ $410
Higher score
vs
Xiaomi 13 Ultra
Xiaomi · 202313 Ultra
9.2Score
9 advantages≈ $420
9.2Display8.8
8.8Performance8.1
8.9Camera9.7
9.0Battery6.3
7.7Features9.3
Dimensions

Size comparison

iQOO Neo9S Pro+13 Ultra
75.7 × 163.5874.6 × 163.29.1
iQOO Neo9S Pro+13 UltraDifference
Height163.5 mm163.2 mm+0.3 mm
Width75.7 mm74.6 mm+1.1 mm
Thickness8 mm9.1 mm−1.1 mm
Weight193 g227 g−34 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is iQOO Neo9S Pro+ better than 13 Ultra?

  1. AnTuTu score2,342,433 vs 1,268,538+85%
  2. Battery capacity5,500 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+10%
  3. Wired charging120 W vs 90 W+33%
  4. Geekbench 6 (multi-core)6,334 vs 5,049+25%
  5. Refresh rate144 Hz vs 120 Hz+20%
  6. 3DMark Wild Life Extreme4,939 vs 3,488+42%
  7. Weight193 g vs 227 g+18%
  8. CPU frequency3.3 GHz vs 3.2 GHz+3%
  9. Charged in 30 min124% vs 86%+44%
  10. Thickness8 mm vs 9.1 mm+14%

Why is 13 Ultra better than iQOO Neo9S Pro+?

  1. Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx82×
  2. Telephoto cameraNo · iQOO Neo9S Pro+: Yes
  3. Wireless chargingNo · iQOO Neo9S Pro+: Yes
  4. Peak brightness1,400 nits vs 2,600 nits+86%
  5. Rear cameras2 vs 42×
  6. Selfie camera16 MP vs 32 MP2×
  7. Pixel density453 ppi vs 522 ppi+15%
  8. USB version2 vs 3.2+60%
  9. Resolution (width)1,260 px vs 1,440 px+14%
Specifications

Side by side

Xiaomi 13 UltraXiaomi 13 Ultra≈ $4209.2
Design
Weight193 g227 g
Thickness8 mm9.1 mm
Height163.5 mm163.2 mm
Width75.7 mm74.6 mm
FramePlasticAluminium
BackGlassEco leather
Ingress protectionIP64IP68
Water resistance (IPx)IPx4IPx8
Glass protection—Corning Gorilla Glass Victus
ColoursBlue/White, Black, WhiteBlack, Olive Green, White, Orange, Yellow, Blue
Display
Screen size6.8″6.7″
PanelLTPO AMOLEDLTPO AMOLED
OLED panelYesYes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)YesYes
Resolution (width)1,260 px1,440 px
Resolution (height)2,800 px3,200 px
Pixel density453 ppi522 ppi
Refresh rate144 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness1,400 nits2,600 nits
Measured brightness—1,207 nits
Screen-to-body ratio89.7%89.5%
HDRYesYes
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
Chip makerQualcommQualcomm
Process4 nm4 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency3.3 GHz3.2 GHz
GPUAdreno 750Adreno 740
AnTuTu score2,342,4331,268,538
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)6,3345,049
3DMark Wild Life Extreme4,9393,488
Memory
RAM16 GB16 GB
Storage (max)1,024 GB1,024 GB
Storage (base)256 GB256 GB
Storage typeUFS 4.0UFS 4.0
Memory card slotNoNo
Camera
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.9f/1.9
Main sensor size1/1.56"1"
Rear cameras24
Optical stabilisationYesYes
Ultra-wide cameraYesYes
Telephoto cameraNoYes
Optical zoom—5×
Max video8K8K
4K video frame rate60 fps60 fps
Selfie camera16 MP32 MP
4K selfie videoNoNo
Battery
Battery capacity5,500 mAh5,000 mAh
Battery typeSi/CLi-Po
Active use (test)—10.2 h
Wired charging120 W90 W
Charged in 30 min124%86%
Wireless chargingNoYes
Wireless charging power—50 W
Reverse wireless charging—Yes
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMNoNo
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.45.3
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-C 2.0USB Type-C 3.2
USB version23.2
Video output—Yes
Infrared portYesYes
Dual-band GPSYesYes
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSSGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC
Features
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5 mm headphone jackNoNo
Loudspeaker loudness—-26 LUFS
Fingerprint sensorUnder display, ultrasonicUnder display
Barometer—Yes
SensorsFingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass, barometer
SAR (head)—0.99 W/kg
Software
OS at launchAndroid 14Android 13
PlatformAndroidAndroid
InterfaceOriginOS 6HyperOS
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare