- android.gs
- Compare
- iQOO Neo9 vs Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Vivo iQOO Neo9 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
What iQOO Neo9 does better (13) and where Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G wins (4) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.2Display8.6
8.6Performance6.3
8.9Camera8.6
8.6Battery8.1
9.2Features6.8
Dimensions
Size comparison
iQOO Neo9Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
| iQOO Neo9 | Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 163.5 mm | 161.1 mm | +2.4 mm |
| Width | 75.7 mm | 74.2 mm | +1.5 mm |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 8 mm | = |
| Weight | 190 g | 187 g | +3 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is iQOO Neo9 better than Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G?
- AnTuTu score1,819,685 vs 718,5232.5×
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)5,692 vs 2,8422×
- 3DMark Wild Life Extreme3,641 vs 7924.6×
- Wired charging120 W vs 67 W+79%
- Storage (max)1,024 GB vs 512 GB2×
- Refresh rate144 Hz vs 120 Hz+20%
- CPU frequency3.2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz+33%
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Max video8K vs 4K
- 4K video frame rate60 fps vs 30 fps2×
- Charged in 30 min133% vs 68%+96%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7 vs Wi-Fi 5+40%
Why is Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G better than iQOO Neo9?
- Main camera50 MP vs 200 MP4×
- Peak brightness1,400 nits vs 1,800 nits+29%
- Rear cameras2 vs 3+50%
- Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.6+15%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 190 g | 187 g |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 8 mm |
| Height | 163.5 mm | 161.1 mm |
| Width | 75.7 mm | 74.2 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Glass | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | — | IP54 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx4 |
| Glass protection | — | Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Colours | Black, Blue, Red | White, Black, Blue, Purple |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | LTPO AMOLED | OLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | Yes | — |
| Resolution (width) | 1,260 px | 1,220 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,800 px | 2,712 px |
| Pixel density | 453 ppi | 446 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,400 nits | 1,800 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 1,330 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.7% | 89.7% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3.2 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 740 | Adreno 710 |
| AnTuTu score | 1,819,685 | 718,523 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 5,692 | 2,842 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 3,641 | 792 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage (max) | 1,024 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.6 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.49" | 1/1.4" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 8K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,160 mAh | 5,100 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 120 W | 67 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 133% | 68% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | proximity, accelerometer, gyro, light, compass, fingerprint |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | OriginOS 4 | MIUI 14 |
