- android.gs
- Compare
- iQOO Neo9 vs Redmi K70E
Vivo iQOO Neo9 vs Xiaomi Redmi K70E
What iQOO Neo9 does better (10) and where Redmi K70E wins (5) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.2Display8.6
8.6Performance8.5
8.9Camera8.4
8.6Battery8.7
9.2Features8.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
iQOO Neo9Redmi K70E
| iQOO Neo9 | Redmi K70E | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 163.5 mm | 160.5 mm | +3 mm |
| Width | 75.7 mm | 74.3 mm | +1.4 mm |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 8.1 mm | −0.1 mm |
| Weight | 190 g | 198 g | −8 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is iQOO Neo9 better than Redmi K70E?
- Wired charging120 W vs 90 W+33%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)5,692 vs 4,708+21%
- Refresh rate144 Hz vs 120 Hz+20%
- 3DMark Wild Life Extreme3,641 vs 2,768+32%
- Max video8K vs 4K
- 4K video frame rate60 fps vs 30 fps2×
- Weight190 g vs 198 g+4%
- Charged in 30 min133% vs 88%+51%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7 vs Wi-Fi 6+17%
- Resolution (width)1,260 px vs 1,220 px+3%
Why is Redmi K70E better than iQOO Neo9?
- Battery capacity5,160 mAh vs 5,500 mAh+7%
- Main camera50 MP vs 64 MP+28%
- AnTuTu score1,819,685 vs 1,886,429+4%
- Peak brightness1,400 nits vs 1,800 nits+29%
- CPU frequency3.2 GHz vs 3.35 GHz+5%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 190 g | 198 g |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 8.1 mm |
| Height | 163.5 mm | 160.5 mm |
| Width | 75.7 mm | 74.3 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Glass | — |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass |
| Colours | Black, Blue, Red | Black, White, Mint |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | LTPO AMOLED | OLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | Yes | — |
| Resolution (width) | 1,260 px | 1,220 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,800 px | 2,712 px |
| Pixel density | 453 ppi | 446 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,400 nits | 1,800 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.7% | 90.1% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 | Mediatek Dimensity 8300 Ultra |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3.2 GHz | 3.35 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 740 | Mali G615-MC6 |
| AnTuTu score | 1,819,685 | 1,886,429 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 5,692 | 4,708 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 3,641 | 2,768 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage (max) | 1,024 GB | 1,024 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | — |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.49" | 1/2.0" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 8K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,160 mAh | 5,500 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 120 W | 90 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 133% | 88% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | OriginOS 4 | HyperOS |
