- android.gs
- Compare
- iQOO Neo9 vs Redmi K60 Ultra
Vivo iQOO Neo9 vs Xiaomi Redmi K60 Ultra
What iQOO Neo9 does better (8) and where Redmi K60 Ultra wins (7) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.2Display9.4
8.6Performance8.6
8.9Camera9.0
8.6Battery7.8
9.2Features9.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
iQOO Neo9Redmi K60 Ultra
| iQOO Neo9 | Redmi K60 Ultra | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 163.5 mm | 162.2 mm | +1.3 mm |
| Width | 75.7 mm | 75.7 mm | = |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 8.5 mm | −0.5 mm |
| Weight | 190 g | 204 g | −14 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is iQOO Neo9 better than Redmi K60 Ultra?
- Battery capacity5,160 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+3%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)5,692 vs 4,931+15%
- 3DMark Wild Life Extreme3,641 vs 3,158+15%
- Weight190 g vs 204 g+7%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7 vs Wi-Fi 6E+8%
- Thickness8 mm vs 8.5 mm+6%
- Resolution (width)1,260 px vs 1,220 px+3%
- Screen-to-body ratio89.7% vs 87.5%+3%
Why is Redmi K60 Ultra better than iQOO Neo9?
- RAM16 GB vs 24 GB+50%
- Peak brightness1,400 nits vs 2,600 nits+86%
- CPU frequency3.2 GHz vs 3.35 GHz+5%
- USB version2 vs 3.2+60%
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 20 MP+25%
- Charged in 30 min133% vs 158%+19%
- Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.7+12%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 190 g | 204 g |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 8.5 mm |
| Height | 163.5 mm | 162.2 mm |
| Width | 75.7 mm | 75.7 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Glass | Glass |
| Ingress protection | — | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | — | Unspecified |
| Colours | Black, Blue, Red | Black, White, Green |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | LTPO AMOLED | OLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | Yes | — |
| Resolution (width) | 1,260 px | 1,220 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,800 px | 2,712 px |
| Pixel density | 453 ppi | 446 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,400 nits | 2,600 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.7% | 87.5% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 | Mediatek Dimensity 9200+ |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3.2 GHz | 3.35 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 740 | Immortalis-G715 MC11 |
| AnTuTu score | 1,819,685 | 1,811,490 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 5,692 | 4,931 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 3,641 | 3,158 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 16 GB | 24 GB |
| Storage (max) | 1,024 GB | 1,024 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.7 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.49" | 1/1.49" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 8K | 8K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 20 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,160 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 120 W | 120 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 133% | 158% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 3.2 |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| Dual-band GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | OriginOS 4 | MIUI 14 |
