- android.gs
- Compare
- iQOO Neo9 Pro (China) vs Redmi K70 Pro
Vivo iQOO Neo9 Pro (China) vs Xiaomi Redmi K70 Pro
What iQOO Neo9 Pro (China) does better (4) and where Redmi K70 Pro wins (9) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.2Display9.2
8.8Camera8.8
8.6Battery7.8
9.2Features9.2
Dimensions
Size comparison
iQOO Neo9 Pro (China)Redmi K70 Pro
| iQOO Neo9 Pro (China) | Redmi K70 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 163.5 mm | 160.9 mm | +2.6 mm |
| Width | 75.7 mm | 75 mm | +0.7 mm |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 8.2 mm | −0.2 mm |
| Weight | 190 g | 209 g | −19 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is iQOO Neo9 Pro (China) better than Redmi K70 Pro?
- Battery capacity5,160 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+3%
- Refresh rate144 Hz vs 120 Hz+20%
- Weight190 g vs 209 g+10%
- Thickness8 mm vs 8.2 mm+2%
Why is Redmi K70 Pro better than iQOO Neo9 Pro (China)?
- Peak brightness1,400 nits vs 4,000 nits2.9×
- RAM16 GB vs 24 GB+50%
- Telephoto cameraNo · iQOO Neo9 Pro (China): Yes
- Pixel density453 ppi vs 526 ppi+16%
- USB version2 vs 3.2+60%
- Rear cameras2 vs 3+50%
- Charged in 30 min133% vs 167%+26%
- Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.6+19%
- Resolution (width)1,260 px vs 1,440 px+14%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 190 g | 209 g |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 8.2 mm |
| Height | 163.5 mm | 160.9 mm |
| Width | 75.7 mm | 75 mm |
| Back | — | Glass |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass |
| Colours | Black, Blue, Red | Black, Silver, Blue/Green, Lamborgini Green, Lamborgini Yellow |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | LTPO AMOLED | OLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | Yes | — |
| Resolution (width) | 1,260 px | 1,440 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,800 px | 3,200 px |
| Pixel density | 453 ppi | 526 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,400 nits | 4,000 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 1,016 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.7% | 89% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9300 | Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3.25 GHz | 3.3 GHz |
| GPU | Immortalis-G720 MC12 | Adreno 750 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 2,486,114 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 7,192 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 4,359 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 16 GB | 24 GB |
| Storage (max) | 1,024 GB | 1,024 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.6 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.49" | 1/1.55" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | Yes |
| Optical zoom | — | 2× |
| Max video | 8K | 8K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,160 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 120 W | 120 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 133% | 167% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 3.2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | OriginOS 4 | HyperOS |
Related comparisons
vs
Samsung Galaxy S23 UltravsVivo iQOO Neo9 Pro (China)9.29.2
vs
Samsung Galaxy S23 UltravsXiaomi Redmi K70 Pro9.29.3
vs
Xiaomi Redmi K80 ProvsXiaomi Redmi K70 Pro9.59.3
vs
Xiaomi Redmi K70 ProvsRealme GT5 Pro9.39.3
vs
Xiaomi Redmi K70 ProvsHonor 100 Pro9.39.3
vs
Xiaomi Redmi K70 ProvsXiaomi Redmi K50 Pro9.38.6
