- android.gs
- Compare
- iQOO Neo9 Pro (China) vs Redmi K70
Vivo iQOO Neo9 Pro (China) vs Xiaomi Redmi K70
What iQOO Neo9 Pro (China) does better (4) and where Redmi K70 wins (5) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.2Display9.2
8.8Camera8.9
8.6Battery7.8
9.2Features9.2
Dimensions
Size comparison
iQOO Neo9 Pro (China)Redmi K70
| iQOO Neo9 Pro (China) | Redmi K70 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 163.5 mm | 160.9 mm | +2.6 mm |
| Width | 75.7 mm | 75 mm | +0.7 mm |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 8.2 mm | −0.2 mm |
| Weight | 190 g | 209 g | −19 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is iQOO Neo9 Pro (China) better than Redmi K70?
- Battery capacity5,160 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+3%
- Refresh rate144 Hz vs 120 Hz+20%
- Weight190 g vs 209 g+10%
- Thickness8 mm vs 8.2 mm+2%
Why is Redmi K70 better than iQOO Neo9 Pro (China)?
- Peak brightness1,400 nits vs 4,000 nits2.9×
- Pixel density453 ppi vs 526 ppi+16%
- Charged in 30 min133% vs 167%+26%
- Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.6+19%
- Resolution (width)1,260 px vs 1,440 px+14%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 190 g | 209 g |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 8.2 mm |
| Height | 163.5 mm | 160.9 mm |
| Width | 75.7 mm | 75 mm |
| Back | — | Glass |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Black, Blue, Red | Black, Silver, Blue/Green, Purple |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | LTPO AMOLED | OLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | Yes | — |
| Resolution (width) | 1,260 px | 1,440 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,800 px | 3,200 px |
| Pixel density | 453 ppi | 526 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,400 nits | 4,000 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.7% | 89% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9300 | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3.25 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| GPU | Immortalis-G720 MC12 | Adreno 740 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 1,757,044 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 5,560 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 3,600 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage (max) | 1,024 GB | 1,024 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.6 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.49" | 1/1.55" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 8K | 8K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,160 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 120 W | 120 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 133% | 167% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | OriginOS 4 | HyperOS |
